View Story | 141 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
</rant>
Sorry to hijack the thread.
Yes We Did.
by RenaRF on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 03:20:28 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
There is no doubt that Bush's numbers will vary by poll, but I doubt that this fluctuation is even real. Polls can be manipulated within a few points quite easily. I read an article last week (can't remember where) which stated that Gallup pollsters rarely read the full questions.
Bush's numbers may be irrelevant now. He may be irrelevant now. What matters are the Democrats. We must turn all pressure on them to make sure they do and say the right things.
Any party that would lie to start a war would also steal an election.
by landrew on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 03:28:45 PM PDT
And I totally agree with you on the Democrats issue -- WHERE IS THEIR UNIFIED, STRONG VOICE?? This is making me crazy.
:: << head explodes >> ::
by RenaRF on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 03:35:32 PM PDT
by Phil S 33 on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 04:30:48 PM PDT
If you haven't already, check the Lakoff diary and the frameshop diary on the recommended list (they were there an hour ago). I'm not encouraged by the democratic non-response. It's like we squandered and opportunity handed to us on a silver platter.
At the risk also of starting a TOTAL flame war, I have to say that I have not been impressed with Dean's inability to get his party leadership in line, which should have been an immediate requirement.
by RenaRF on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 04:48:18 PM PDT
The problem is the dems in Washington aren't taking full advantage. For goodness' sake, Clinton is still a hawk!
A few more weeks of this and I'm gonna start thinking the Dems in office don't want a majority.
by LithiumCola on Mon Sep 12, 2005 at 04:50:24 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 141 comments