View Story | 293 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
by Shuvo Dutta on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 01:00:07 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Will Bush appoint himself dictator for life? That could well be the end result if the 4th Court of Appeals decision is upheld by the Supreme Scum.
What would stop Bush from declaring that it was just too dangerous to hold the 2008 election? Surely not Joe Lieberman, he would just continue to kiss Bush and confirm incompetent jerks like Mike Brown.
by MD patriot on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 01:18:05 PM PDT
If he were not bound by the 2 term limit, I'd say we could expect an election-rigging in 2008, but the Republicans themselves were so outraged that a liberal would take office and impede their rollback of the New Deal for almost 16 years straight that they may have cut off their own noses to spite their face in amending the constitution to limit Presidential terms.
Warned you we tried. Listen you did not. Now screwed we all are.
by slippytoad on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 04:02:31 PM PDT
This was not a 'reasonable' seizure because there was no probable cause, as the MPs freely acknowledged, and no warrant was issued.
by skralyx on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 02:37:23 PM PDT
Serious grey area, however. I'm no expert.
Do you have a child? Will you send her to the war?... anon
by andreww on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 05:42:14 PM PDT
Show me a man trying to enforce martial law in America, and I will show you a foreign invader or a traitor to the Republic.
Had enough yet?
by phillies on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 05:48:33 PM PDT
Otherwise the US would be a police state.
Is Cheney telling us something?
by gogol on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 06:22:49 PM PDT
We talked about this in my law school class the other day. Our professor talked about how there was a press conference with everybody, and they were very careful NOT to declare martial law.
So the dude should not have been detained. Full stop.
by modchick65 on Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 07:19:44 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 293 comments