Daily Kos

View Story | 308 comments

  •  Do you happen to have them (none / 1)

    cached?

    by seanleckey on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 02:03:14 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  I posted a few (4.00 / 3)

      here.

      They've not only shut down the abliity to comment, but the abliity to read all previous comments. I would think their system is good enough so that they could delete individual hate-speech or extreme comments rather than chunking the feedback mechanism altogether.

      'Everybody's born-again these days; if you're not born-again you're dead, you're out of touch, yours is a minority view, you lose.' Barthelme 'Nat.Sel.'

      by jorndorff on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 02:15:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  that would expose the lie (none / 0)

        I suspect that the WaPo has the power to delete the offensive posts, but the deletion of two or three vulgar posts wouldn't end the embarrassment the WaPo was enduring

        face it, the WaPo got caught with the DailyKOS equivilent of a troll, and they let the troll have front page privliges

        instead of losing the troll, the WaPo lost the community

        had to kill that village cause it would have killed us

        by knowthings on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 03:20:42 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  DU have some.. (4.00 / 5)

      http://www.democraticunderground.com/...

      by back2basics on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 02:21:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  LOTS are here (4.00 / 6)

      wapolies.blogspot.com

      Rise Against.

      by georgia10 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 02:21:45 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Pure Gold (4.00 / 2)

        And from what I have read so far, not a single instance of profanity. Of course, I'm not finished, yet.

        MS. Howell main objective seems to be to cloud the issue by using an expansive definition of association so that it tars both the parties equally. Why cannot she just first say that all of Abramoff's personal contributions went to Republicans?

        Let me diagram her logic for her.
        B and C have been giving money to D for a long time.
        Now A acquires B and C as clients.
        B and C continue to give money to D.
        A turns out to be a criminal.
        So A and D are part of a criminal enterprise.

        Amazing!
        I should be an ombudsman. How does one get such a position?

        Posted by: lib | Jan 19, 2006 12:08:40 PM

        Bet she blew a gasket after reading that one. How dare those informed provocateurs throw truth and facts at their betters. Oh god, I gotta lay down...

        by strangely enough on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 04:48:47 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

View Story | 308 comments