Daily Kos

View Story | 7 comments

  •  This is why I joined the (0+ / 0-)

    Congressional Committees Project. I want to monitor the Committee on House Administration and the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration. These are the committees are entrusted with dealing with election issues. Consider joining as well.

    I support Holt's bill, but it's not quite a no-brainer. There are those who are opposed to it because they think it doesn't go far enough. Although it's drafted to serve as a floor for election integrity rather than a ceiling, these people think that passage of the bill will take away pressure for a more comprehensive approach. I'm not convinced by that argument, but it needs to be acknowledged.

    Also, it's important to distinguish between a paper TRAIL and a paper BALLOT OF RECORD. Paper TRAILS are better than nothing, but only serve a purpose if the trail is examined by the person casting the vote, if the trail is not eaten (for instance, by a paper jam), and if the trail actually matches the electronic vote.

    Paper BALLOTS OF RECORD may be produced with or without the aid of a voting machine, but the user examines it before submitting it, and the physical ballot is what is counted.

    Holt's bill demands a ballot of record, which is good.

    Even now, before the Congress switchover, a majority of the House has signed on as co-sponsors of the bill. So prospects do look good.

    For more background, please go to the Voting Rights page on the dKosopedia.

    John McCain: no health insurance for kids.

    by AlanF on Tue Dec 12, 2006 at 03:48:27 PM PDT

    •  hi Alan, thanks for the feedback. (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      AlanF

      Voter verifiable paper trail, with auditable secure central tabulation / GEMS

      We cannot forget about central tabulation.

      I'm aware of the argument that the Holt bill doesn't go far enough, and as i'm concerned, that's the fight that should go to the states.

      Meaning, let's stop the bleeding before we try to run the marathon.

      Anyway, you've done great work, and as a long time VV activist, it makes me glad you are keeping up on it.

      -C.

      •  You're welcome. (0+ / 0-)

        And I agree about stopping the bleeding.

        The only thing that confused me a bit was your use of the word "GEMS" together with the word "secure". For those who don't know, GEMS (Global Election Management Services), is the proprietary software that runs on Diebold servers and is notoriously insecure. It sounded like you were using "GEMS" as a generic word for "central tabulation software". One thing we don't want is for "Diebold" to be considered the "Kleenex" of voting machines. On the other hand, we do want to throw them away...

        John McCain: no health insurance for kids.

        by AlanF on Tue Dec 12, 2006 at 06:49:25 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

View Story | 7 comments