View Story | 138 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
We're running on four themes, and the first one is to re-orient our national defense to a more traditional set of policies that truly relate to defending our interests abroad. I believe the Iraq War was a serious strategic error that has cost the nation a great deal in terms of blood, treasure and international respect. At the same time I am a realist when it comes to the legitimate need to defend our interests. These needs are sometimes strategic, and in rare instances (e.g., now, the need to root out international terrorism) related to direct combat. We need to begin a careful withdrawal from Iraq. The first step in doing so involves a clear signal to the region that we have no long-term interests in that country.
by Jim Webb on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:09:15 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
BushCo has turned our view of "allies" v. "enemies" upsidedown - at least that is how I feel. I watched Bush essentially threaten our traditionall allies, France and Germany, in the Canary Islands speech just prior to the Iraq invasion.
Then these past weeks he claims that the United Arab Emirates is essentially the greatest ally we've ever had.
What I find very troubling now and have always been troubled by with this administration is that our "key allies" in their eyes seem to be countries that are anything but democratic. While our traditional allies that are democratic seem to be cast aside.
I think having a hit man "on your side" is probably a good thing in the short term, but is it a good thing in the long run? Do you see what I am saying? In any case, your comment about bringing us back to a more traditional set of policies made me want to ask. I mean I'd like to keep the tradition of revering our democratic counter-parts around the world and keeping at arms length the dictators, monarchies, theocracies etc.
Thanks for running. I hope you win.
by inclusiveheart on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 05:11:47 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 138 comments