View Story | 138 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
I have a great respect for Senator Feingold. I view him as one of the few people in the Senate who are focusing on issues that are debilitating to the process of government (campaign finance, e.g.). I'm not sure I would support a censure over the NSA surveillance issue, but I do believe that people need to keep connecting the dots on the widespread abuse of power in this Presidency. Too many people in the Congress want to "kiss that issue" as it goes by. I do not understand what it is that the Administration wishes to conceal in the NSA issue, because it was a simple matter for them to file the appropriate notice at the time.
This issue dovetails with others, to the point that it demonstrates a pattern. For instance, the Ports issue is every bit as much about the hubris of the Administration, and its refusal to coordinate such important decisions, as it is about the contracts themselves.
Issues such as these are the main reason that one of the themes of our campaign is the need for the Congress to reassert itself as a co-equal branch of government. And I believe Senator Feingold might be a strong ally in that respect.
by Jim Webb on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:16:40 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
...hopefully during the coming campaign you will decide that Feingold's resolution was in fact appropriate, and needed. Good luck in your campaign and thanks for fighting the good fight.
by mike20169 on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:23:05 PM PDT
I'm not saying that I would not support a censure. This is a new proposal and one of my reservations would be that it is aimed at only one element of Presidential abuse. However, we all know how such processes can gum up the Congress (the rather ridiculous impeachment proceedings against Pres Clinton come to mind). My strong feeling is that we need to keep talking about these abuses, and bring people into the Congress who will stand up to them. Wouldn't it be nice to have a Congress that was willing to subpoena the right officials, and that demanded to see what the administration was really doing, and who, exactly, was being listened to during those NSA sessions?
by Jim Webb on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:41:46 PM PDT
Thank you for clarifying. One of the problems seems to be stonewalling on the part of the executive branch. Even Senator Specter has stated that they are getting little to no cooperation from the President. It also doesn't help that the majority of the GOP is running interference by planning to change the law and making it retroactive.
by cwaltz on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:49:15 PM PDT
Help end world hunger by providing rice to hungry people for free.
by OLinda on Tue Mar 14, 2006 at 04:26:01 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 138 comments