View Story | 9 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
Just add the word "natural" in front of "person"...
We have no intention of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh because lying through your teeth and being stupid isn't a crime.
by The Baculum King on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 09:32:29 PM PDT
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
American Fascism 101 A Must Read
by cognitive dissonance on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 10:21:56 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Never saw that happen before, but at least you can't troll-rate me either ;)
by The Baculum King on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 10:26:06 PM PDT
is a huge feat. Would it not be easier to enact Federal legislation or code, that simply defines a "person" as a "person", rather than defining a "person" as a "corporation".
Actually, I don't see anything in the 14th that suggests a corporation is a person; rather, there is "code", which is ratified by the Supreme Court, that suggests the same. It appears to me that no Constitutional Amendment is required, and this is the most extreme action. All we need is a Congress who once again recognizes that a person is a person, and a corporation is not a person, and the Court will simply agree.
by LtdEdishn on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 10:25:56 PM PDT
What was corruptly done in one of their opinions over a century ago, and they have notably failed to do so.
Amending the Constitution leaves them no choice.
by The Baculum King on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 10:28:11 PM PDT
and that is why I suggest that it is easier to amend Statutes or Code, than is it is to amend the Constitution. Of course, even as it relates toward amending the Code, we need a sympathetic Congress.
by LtdEdishn on Thu Mar 30, 2006 at 10:42:00 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 9 comments