Daily Kos

View Story | 25 comments

  •  Talk about casting pearls before swine (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Land of Enchantment, dougymi

    We gotta get Clarke out of the Fux right wing echo chamber and get him in front of an audience that has ears to hear.

    What's with the goofy font? :)

    "I've waited all my life for a Republican Barack Obama. Now he shows up and he's a Democrat." - Frank Luntz

    by The Termite on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 09:31:04 AM PDT

    •  I think it's a 2008 strategy (6+ / 0-)

      It could be that he's just being visible to Republicans.  He's getting a chance to display his knowledge and credentials to those who would not normally vote Democratic.  Come 2008, he won't be an unknown.  It will be harder for the Republicans to turn him into a cartoon as they did with Kerry and Gore, because he'll already be a known quantity to Fox viewers.  

      They may not agree with him, but it will be hard for Rove and Co. to convince them that he's a left wing crackpot.

      •  It's the media, stupid (0+ / 0-)

        February 1, 2000
        Al Gore v. the Media

        By Robert Parry

        To read the major newspapers and to watch the TV pundit shows, one can't avoid the impression that many in the national press corps have decided that Vice President Al Gore is unfit to be elected the next president of the United States.

        Across the board -- from The Washington Post to The Washington Times, from The New York Times to the New York Post, from NBC's cable networks to the traveling campaign press corps -- journalists don't even bother to disguise their contempt for Gore anymore.

        At one early Democratic debate, a gathering of about 300 reporters in a nearby press room hissed and hooted at Gore's answers. Meanwhile, every perceived Gore misstep, including his choice of clothing, is treated as a new excuse to put him on a psychiatrist's couch and find him wanting.

        Journalists freely call him "delusional," "a liar" and "Zelig." Yet, to back up these sweeping denunciations, the media has relied on a series of distorted quotes and tendentious interpretations of his words, at times following scripts written by the national Republican leadership.

        Just say NO to BAYH (for VP)! Here's why!

        by NeuvoLiberal on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 10:40:54 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  no, keep him there (4+ / 0-)

      And get Paul Hackett in there too!

      These are guys who know how to talk to a Fox audience. Fox is on everywhere, and not everyone who watches it is a Republican. The more people we have on there deconstructing their crap in real time, the better. Especially when it's a chickenhawk debating a war, and in Clark's case, human rights as well, hero.

      You got no fear of the underdog. That's why you will not survive. - Spoon

      by brainiacamor on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 09:48:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  ya know (2+ / 0-)

      I'm pretty outspoken about how I'd like all Democrats to refuse to appear on fox. I'd really like to marginalize them to just be the republikan network that they are and only speak to republikans.  However, if you're going to put a Democrat on foxspews (and that appears to be what they are planning on doing), you need to put guys like Clark and Hackett and Charlie Rangell on.  They are the only ones to talk tough enough and knowledgeably enough about military matters to give the foxspews hawks a run for their money.  Clark was great! No one can question his military credentials (or Hackett's or Rangell's either) and he is tougher than any fox host.  I like that.

      A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams

      by dougymi on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 10:08:43 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

View Story | 25 comments