View Story | 58 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
It's quite a stretch to opine the WSJ article "proves" HRC is the candidate the Right wants the Democratic Party to nominate.
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow." -- Albert Einstein
by KnowVox on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 03:34:30 PM PDT
You don't seem to have a problem with nominating a DLC hawk. That's fine; a difference of opinion makes a horse race.
Replete with "misstatements" and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions.--Carl Bernstein on HRC's record.
by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 03:49:35 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
My comment history "proves" I support DEMOCRATS, and I'm not a "Hillary Hater." Ergo, by your logic, I must be part of that illusive "vast right wing conspiracy." Damn!! LOLOLOL
by KnowVox on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 06:21:45 PM PDT
"further proof", but apart from that quibble I find the analysis compelling.
"Conservatism... is basically a public relations campaign aimed at persuading [people] to lay down their capacity for rational thought." -= Phil Agre
by suburi on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 03:51:27 PM PDT
I've made that change to my diary.
by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 03:53:54 PM PDT
Since the WSJ article doesn't really consistute hard "evidence."
(I'm just yanking your chain. Enjoyed your diary and gave you a rec before even proceeding to the comments section.)
by suburi on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 04:04:04 PM PDT
"Please Nominate This Man" it's reverse psychology.
Basically, if it's the candidate I want it's reverse psychology and they're really afraid of the candidate.
If it's the candidate I don't want it's the right saying they want us to pick the candidate they know they'll have easiest time defeating.
Funny how that works.
by Edgar08 on Thu Jan 18, 2007 at 04:20:26 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 58 comments