View Story | 419 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
Wow. You should do a diary on this. It certainly is an extra-ordinary example of the insanity of our "great" system... cures cancer and then renders you as uninsurable therefter!
click to learn about Single Payer Health Care
by DrSteveB on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 05:51:09 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
As is the fact that I was divorcing when diagnosed, covered at the time by my now ex-husband's insurance, working for a small non-profit myself that did not offer insurance at the time: and was strongly advised by everyone from the hospital's financial counselors to my own attorney to give up every asset to the ex, take on all joint financial obligations, and never, ever, consider going to work for an employer who offers insurance: because the bean-counters would soon discover the burden to the company in "surcharges" and "adjustments" would far outweigh my worth as an employee - so they would find "cause" to fire me.
Two or three of those experiences and you are not just uninsurable, you are also unemployable.
Sort of the perfect storm of health-care-system irony.
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 06:15:03 AM PDT
found myself in the same boat. It's easy to blame HR departments for this, but my late father, who worked in upper management, assured me it wasn't their fault--it came from the very top.
BTW, congrats for beating leukemia. That's some feat!
People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election. --Otto von Bismarck
by Ice Blue on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 06:56:05 AM PDT
My ex actually worked for a municipality (he's a cop) and their underwriter slapped a million dollar surcharge on their policy - over me - so they tried to find another underwriter and got an entire series of "no bid until she drops off the cobra" responses from virtually every big, medium and little name in insurance.
So, yeah, I know what you mean, hard to justify I am worth an extra million a year to an employer on top of my salary and other benefits. I blame the whole screwed-up system.
Thanks, and actually, I had such an easy course of treatment and recovery my kids (two in high school, two in middle school and all terrified at the time) go around now telling people they think I "faked" leukemia for the vacation from them in a clean room. I had extraordinarily good doctors, nurses, treatment, care, etc at a top-notch teaching hospital.
I got lucky, though, and I know it. Not everyone is so fortunate in the level of expertise and care they receive. I know the first oncologist/hematologist I saw threatened to sue my insurer to get me into that particular hospital. According to him - at least at that time - leukemia survival rates are 50% higher in teaching hospitals than even in major medical centers - such as my insurer first wanted me to check into.
Good for you recovering from that stroke. Perhaps we will both have access one day - until then, lets just hope we both stay healthy. I honestly think that is the only real way to beat the current system!
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:18:10 AM PDT
If you work at a small to medium-sized company it's easy for the health insurance system to make pariahs out of your ill co-workers and their families. Where I work, it's common knowledge that two individuals (out of 250) have wreaked havoc on our insurance over the past few years. One had a brain aneurysm, and survived. Another's wife had premature twins; she was hospitalized for 6 weeks, and the twins for 8 weeks after they were born. (They are all perfectly healthy now.) The father of the twins works for another firm now, but I know him pretty well and was told that care for his family was billed at well over $1,000,000.
To give you an idea of the upshot of this: At one point there was only one insurer in the state willing to even quote us a rate. Another time, we had to shop for a new insurer because the existing one was going to increase our premium by 40%, just to renew our policy for one year. We used to be able to get 3-year contracts, but no one will sell us those anymore. The insurers want it year-to-year so they can keep their options open.
To my employer's great credit, they have not been tempted by any of the perverse incentives to cut loose the ill employees. Nor do you hear anyone grousing about it. I think everyone hopes that we'll get the same treatment if and when our time comes.
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
by Joe Bob on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:55:55 AM PDT
its weaker members, and do the "killing" themselves!
Not literally, you understand. Just "Murder by Spreadsheet", brought to you by your friendly insurance company.
But hey, their hands are clean! Look, they just washed them! snark.
Remember Nataline.
by means are the ends on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:20:05 AM PDT
back before Reagan and "health care for corporate profit" (debut HMOs), Blue Cross/Blue Shield non-profit organizations and non-profit hospitals provided good care and insurance for nearly everyone. The ultra rich could buy their gold-plated insurance, but BCBS covered most others and it was affordable.
Then, the "Reagan Revolution" (attack the poor, afflict the afflicted, comfort and enrich the wealthy) took place. Enter HMOs who told corporations they could insure employees for a fraction of the BCBS cost. Supposedly, for-profit corporate insurance was "more efficient" than te non-profits. Boom!
Every corporation ran into the open arms of private, for profit, insurance companies. BCBS began to collapse, be sold off, converted to profit, etc.
What was the hidden secret? Yes, HMOs could insure EMPLOYEEs very cheaply, but that's because they were employees. The very fact that the people were working was self-selecting: the population base of company employees was also the most healthy population base.
What was left out of that base? Children, unemployed, elderly, the infirm. And those are the high medical cost populations.
So, corporations got cheap health rates (for a few years) while everyone else was thrown into the gutter.
Remember that everytime you hear the name "Reagan." That single concept will explain his entire legacy: Corporate Profits over concern for the weak, poor, young and elderly. And it repeats and repeats in every issue you can raise about Reagan, for example:
Iran/Contra: deny elected socialists government office in Central America to insure corporate profits for US multinational companies. Since Congress outlawed direct aid to the CIA-backed Contras, sell arms to Iran (enriching corrupt Republican companies) to obtain cash for Contras. Prop up corrupt military dictatorships for the same reason.
by YucatanMan on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:36:58 AM PDT
It is all too ordinary. There are millions of cancer survivors in this country. How insurable are they? Or anyone who has ever had a serious illness?
And what happens when someone does get sick.
I have a bone lesion that almost everyone thought would be malignant and a death sentence. Sure I would have been covered up to my death through my husband's small business - but one of my biggest worries was that if I had cancer, and if I died, my husband's small business's health insurance history would be so bad due to my expenses that their preimiums would go through the roof and his business would no longer be able to provide health insurance for their employees and that 12 families would lose coverage b/c I got sick. Just one more thing to worry about while waiting for the test results.
With the current sytem you'd have to be nuts to be tested to see if you have carry a gene for cancer or any other disease - you'd be uninsurable. You'd have to be nuts to pursue a diagnosis for a disease for which there is no effective treatment or cure - just management of symptoms - you'd be uninsurable. What happens to folks who get sick with something like MS or cancer and have to quit work. What happens to their coverage after COBRA ends?
With the current system having health insurance is NO COMFORT. There is no guarantee that it will be there when you need it, or that it will not be cancelled or taken away. It is really just a scam.
If you want something other than the obvious to happen - you've got to do something other than the obvious...Douglas Adams
by trillian on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:04:25 AM PDT
The only really effective way to get access and keep it under the current system is to never get sick and actually need access.
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:20:39 AM PDT
We need to make sure that this is not framed an "insured v. uninsured".
The current insurance system is NOT working for anyone other than those who don't need it...yet.
by trillian on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:23:41 AM PDT
I'd just like to add that Bush's new plan is, imho, a blatent attempt to incent (currently) healthy individuals to go from their employment-based plans to individual coverage which they can deduct.
Very business-friendly in general, not just insurance-company-friendly. Employers want nothing so badly as to divest themselves of the risk and expense of carrying sick individuals, or individuals with a history of being sick or a potential to get sick, on their plans. In fact, they mostly want out of the health-insurance benefit expectation alltogether.
Once enough healthy and wealthy individuals and families have opted out in order to enjoy that tax benefit, the employment-based system - already primed to collapse like a house of cards - will do just that.
So we need to start framing this for what it is: Bush's attempt to free big business from any insurance benefit obligation without offering anything in the way of providing coverage for people who really need it and/or can't get or afford it.
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30 AM PDT
the interest of the government insofar as health insurance goes, is catastrophic coverage. It has an incentive to see that people have it, and the feds should provide it to the poor and to those too sick to otherwise get it.
If people want to have gold plated plans that largely just prepay their medical expenses, because they don't want to be bothered with seeing what things actually cost, that is nice but it is not the obligation of government to subsidize it.
Especially if the feds then can't afford to let people with individual plans deduct their cost.
If limiting deductibility of expense for group plans encourages adoption of higher deductible catastrophic plans, that in the long run will be good for the health market, and once people start seeing what things actually cost, there will be greater incentive to bring down the costs overall.
Enterpriser; Hard core Libertarian: +6.63 / -4.41
by jimsaco on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 12:00:52 PM PDT
remove investors from the system.
"I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies; for the hardest victory is over self." --Aristotle
by java4every1 on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 01:32:59 PM PDT
their should be a government plan that provides for preventive and catastrophic - both are in the interests of the government.
If enough people want something more the insurance market should be able to provide it.
by trillian on Wed Jan 24, 2007 at 08:01:22 AM PDT
why health care insurance should not be for profit. Incentives are to cut the sick and insure the well, not insure the risk.
Can anyone tell me what's "centrist" about using the Constitution to wipe your ass? - ActivistGuy
by billlaurelMD on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:23:44 AM PDT
I'm over 50 and I only pay $269/month with a $10,000 deductible, can only get sick on the third Tuesday of the 7th month of leap year on the southern tip of Mongolia where there is no transportation to any expensive modern hospitals.
It's a terrific policy. Anyone can buy one. Call Joe's Health Insurance and Pawn Shop. Pawn your shit to get insurance. (/snark)
Seriously, I have never gotten sick ever. Never made a claim ever. I'm scared to get a check up because if they do find something, my rates with take a moonshot and I can't afford it. Better to use it in an emergency or for an illness where's it possible to recover, extend treatment out as long as possible, and then wait until medicare or death. I can stop working and see if I can get medicaid. We do have some state insurance plans, and I plan to check into it, but being self-employed and getting health insurance even if you've never been sick is huge.
A friend of mine is 59 and had a triple by-pass. His wife had a knee operation and now his monthly premiums are $2500. But if they are late 1 day past any grace period in the policy, they'll be dropped like a rock and they won't be able to find insurance.
Watching Lou Dobbs one night: Dobbs was talking about the health care system with a pretty smart Doc. Dobbs said "We have the finest health Care in the world but very few can get access to it ( Paraphrased). The Doc responded; "Lou, your a little bit off; we no longer have the greatest health care system in the world. It's not even in the top ten and we still can't afford it.
I think people still operate under the assumption that we do have the greatest health care system in the world, it's just the price is out of reach.
Wrong.
We are paying out the nose for access to second rate care. If something major was wrong, I would have no qualms about going out of the country to get treated and paying cash. It would be 10-20% of what it costs here and my Health Insurance company wouldn't get a claim.
Support Col Hackworth's because tomorrow is just a promise, not a guarantee
by Dburn on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:52:18 AM PDT
I'm scared to get a check up because if they do find something, my rates with take a moonshot and I can't afford it.
Should have thought of this. So now we can add "underutilization of primary care by essentially healthy people that could prevent bigger problems out of paralyzing fear" to "underinsured" eh?
And I bet there are a lot of people with coverage who see it this way - it just never occurred to me.
Is there really any way this system could be any more screwed up?
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:08:02 AM PDT
I am insured through my college. If I wasn't a full-time student, I would not have been covered. At 43, I'm too fucking old. My husband's 54, and has just been diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma. I couldn't have added him to my policy if I wanted to: he's too old. And if we could, and he fell ill while insured by the college's insurer, we would have had to pay 10% of all the costs he incurred while they were figuring out what he had anyway. In a weird way, being destitute and a candidate for MediCal is better than being insured in his case.
I had to wait 6 months to be covered for the blood pressure meds I'm on, and I have to do my birth control through FamilyPACT which is a special service in California because it's not covered by the college's insurance. The fact that I don't get my insurance through an employer and it's paid for by student loans (oww my aching bunghole) means I still get my mental health services through the County.
We are through the looking glass with health care in America. We are OVERDUE for single-payer here.
I did a diary asking Canadian and European Kossacks to talk about their health care experiences on Sunday. It was really interesting if 100% statistically invalid.
http://www.dailykos.com/...
It's already expired, but it's still quite interesting.
New frame: they aren't pro-life, they are advocates of forced childbearing. "The two Americas are the very rich and everybody else." -- J. Edwards
by Snakes on a White House on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:38:24 AM PDT
Yeah. But still...
As Twain observed, there are lies, damned lies and statistics. We get screwed over with carefully crafted statistics all the time.
We're urged not to listen to non-statistical evidence (and sometimes, with good reason).
But it's easy as hell to find Americans without health care coverage. It's easy as hell to find Americans with it who are terrified of losing it AND dissatisfied with it.
It's hard to find that many Canadians and Europeans as upset with theirs. After all, they have it. Sure, it's not perfect (nothing is). But they have it, it works, the statistics show that people are generally very happy with it, and they're not living in fear of losing their health care, and then losing everything they own because of an illness, and then being unable to file bankruptcy.
We need not think alike to love alike -- Ferenc Dávid
by ogre on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:21:04 AM PDT
I just got laid off last week, so I don't really know where I am (literally and figuratively).
But I HAD pretty good insurance. My sister is a Nurse Practitioner and she looked over it for me once and was amazed at the coverage. It even covered mental health and elective abortions! (It was an international company that is more enlightened than most.) But I was afraid to use it for fear I still couldn't afford it for even simple things.
I had a problem with one of my knees a while back and I am still paying for the MRI to tell me that there really wasn't anything they could do except put me on meds (VIOXX!) forever. I also got a good screwing over by the doctor and insurance company in what can only be described as a scam on their parts. They got me in to the office and performed procedures knowing full well what insurance I had, then when they billed it, I got some cockamamie story about their insurance person forgetting to pay the bills for my company and their agreement lapsed, so even though I had coverage they couldn't take it and now I'm liable for everything.
So I never went to the doctor for anything ever again -- even when I was really sick with the flu. I might have be able to afford the co-pays for visits and meds, but I couldn't have paid all the extra charges for tests and things they tack on all the time and think nothing of it. So even though I had pretty good insurance, I haven't had a check up or a well-woman exam in almost 5 years. Who knows what's going wrong inside me?
And now it really doesn't matter anyway -- my insurance went away when my job did.
I wish I could marry a Canadian.
by Brooke In Seattle on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:59:35 AM PDT
at one point right after my cobra expired. I had a horrible job-offer, but considered it very seriously anyway, as a Canadian friend informed me you are covered whether a citizen or not the second you cross the border. But I had kids in high school and college and just couldn't afford to go.
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:04:09 AM PDT
No. There is a 90 day waiting period.
don't tase me, bro
by BradMajors on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:40:27 AM PDT
either I was previously misinformed or that has since changed - it was several years ago.
by Downtowner on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:46:37 AM PDT
I was in a car accident in Canada once. The paramedics were joking about how I was lucky I hadn't crossed the border yet since I didn't have any insurance. Amazing what a line on a map can do. Health insurance was one of the major motivating factors in getting married, my partner got insurance through a new job and if we were married before she started I could get on it immediately.
"The power to dominate rests on the differential possession of knowledge" -Foucault
by Jett on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 01:22:17 PM PDT
Fed law says the employer has to let you continue your health insurance for a limited period after layoff, if you pay the premiums yourself. Check with the HR dept. This might be the only way you can get insurance if you have a pre-existing condition.
by kurt on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 02:18:02 PM PDT
I had health Insurance in the 90s and had to take meds that were running around $300 a month. They raised rates relentlessly to cover the costs ( you will pay for those meds one way or the other). I missed a bill, and was a day late past the grace period. I was immediately canceled. No appeal. Bye , you're history.
I was able to get a short term major medical policy with company that filed for bankruptcy, 1 month after I canceled. Gee Guys, sorry. That missed premium must have hurt. Seriously, Imagine if something happened.
Then I slowly jumped from a crappy policy to a less crappy policy until I got to just a crap policy. I manage my health care. I take my BP at home and send out for Cholesterol exams. I try to keep the numbers below optimal. I beat down 250 Total Cholesterol by taking massive amount of Niacin , exercise and diet to a total of 137. I haven't had a a triglyceride reading for awhile. But I feel like I'm in ok shape for an old fart. My weight is at college level-thin. I don't smoke or drink.
The drugs that I was on I could no longer afford so I researched the equivalents and told the Doc here's what I want. Got the generics and get em from Costco for $18.00 a month. The same drugs sell for $560 ( 90 day supply) at Wal Greens.
Folks if you are using your health Insurance cards and getting your drugs for low co-pays at that convenient corner chain drug store you are part of the problem because they are marking drugs up 2000% - except for patented drugs- and making a bloody fortune because they know people only care about their co-pay and if they have to take 5 minutes out of their day to pick up a script.
The Insurance company gets the bill and they keep jacking their rates up. Until they get so high you get informed at your jobs that your coverage has either been discontinued , you have been laid off or you get a choice to pay a monster rate or do without.
The Insurance problem isn't all the Insurance companies. Its the Pharmacies, it's the people who don't bother to price drugs out until they finally are faced with the prospect of not having a copay. Then they become some real mean shoppers like I am.
It's the Doctors who prescribe expensive patent protected drugs becuase the drug rep just filled up his tank with gas and it's patients who don't ask their doctors for equivalents and insist on buying the cool new advertised overpriced re-patented drug that was re-labeled and got a cool new color and the price went up 200% after they paid the generic company a few hundred mil to hold off for 3 or 4 years.
I don't know what the percentage of the overall health care bill is occupied by drugs, but based on personal experience I have a feeling insurance rates would become more affordable if drug companies, doctors, patients and pharmacies weren't confident that insurance companies would be covering the bill.
One of the many ways of bringing drug prices down is to stop listening to that R&D bullshit from the drug companies. Give them short hard and fast patents and regulate the fuck out of them. Then move on to all the other offenders.
We all share a bit of blame for the sad state of our system. It would be nice to blame it all on the Insurance companies - sure they deserve some- but it's way past time that we start taking a holistic look ( no pun intended) at the whole system that keeps those rates rising relentlessly until no one can afford it. Ask an insurance company what would happen if they discontinued Health insurance and I don't think you would see too many tears.
Consider this- The Insurance rep who sold me the current policy doesn't get her first commission for the sale for one year. If I turned in a bunch of claims I imagine they would find a way of cutting it down to 0
Until Costco was able to get some of the ones I needed, I was getting them from Canada.
by Dburn on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:15:18 PM PDT
I had a skin lesion that at first thought was cancer. My first reaction was not oh my god I hope I live; it was oh my god I hope my insurance doesn't drop me. How sick is that?
by sunshineonthebay on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 11:58:34 AM PDT
It is enough to make you want to keep cash on hand so that you can pay for a diagnosis "off the books" before deciding whether or not to use your insurance.
-5.00 -4.46
by ilex on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 02:59:27 PM PDT
...and put them on Bush's desk.
In TX-32, track the voting record of Pete Sessions at SessionsWatch.
by CoolOnion on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:12:30 AM PDT
...doesn't listen.
Unless the dog was going to pee on his desktop they'd be wasted.
It's up to us to continue to pressure Congress and the pack of Presidential wanna- bes in '08 to CHANGE THE ***ING SYSTEM. Or they can join the ranks of the unemployed.
John Doolittledump Doo Vote Brown
by AmericanRiverCanyon on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:22:45 AM PDT
...with reams and reams of paper, somebody would notice--especially if we tried to crash the gate and get to his desk.
by CoolOnion on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:50:13 AM PDT
by AmericanRiverCanyon on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:09:43 AM PDT
"Universal health care for every man, woman & child. That is our cause." -John Edwards 1/30/2008 [-8.63, -7.03]
by jesses on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:33:10 AM PDT
Send them to the Democratic candidates for 2008.
HR 676 is the best health reform proposal worth my vote.
by kck on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:10:43 AM PDT
Both Democrats & Republicans.
Try Mariva's Guide. You'll like it!
by mariva on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:49:50 AM PDT
by sunshineonthebay on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 12:01:44 PM PDT
You can only get it if the insurance companies don't think you're going to need it. Look at what's happening to home owners in coastal areas -- they can't get insurance either.
What people need is health care, not insurance.
it's dark in the goth house
by McJulie on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:52:07 AM PDT
A friend stopped taking her antidepressant because she didn't like how it made her feel. Instead of consulting her doctor, who would have helped her taper the drug, she just stopped. A few days later, she had a seizure on the street and a bystander called an ambulance. The ER set up a drug-tapering schedule and she has had no further problems.
This person worked for a small (less than 15 people) business. When their insurance came up for renewal, because of that seizure, their group rate went up so high the employer couldn't afford it. So -- in a truly nice gesture -- he gave everyone a raise equivalent to what he had been paying for their insurance the previous year and told them to buy individual insurance. It worked out fine for everyone except my friend. She was uninsurable and had to change jobs (and take a cut in pay) so she could be covered.
by el dorado gal on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:35:55 AM PDT
"can't get health insurance" posts and thinking to myself "You guys are exaggerating". Not in the sense that you're overstating the case - you're making it appear that it takes something actually serious (cancer, seizure) to be denied coverage.
When my daughter was less than a year old, we noticed one of her fat little legs was bigger around than the other, and occasionally she had little marks (hemangioma) appear on them. Being good parents we asked the doctor about it, and after seeing a specialist or two ended up at a pediatric surgeon. He ordered X-Rays of her legs with dye injections - it was a vascular condition.
It turned out she has "Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome", where basically one leg has a better blood supply than the other, so it gets bigger. Both legs are within normal range - they're just different. The end result is that there were no symptoms other than the difference in size - no pain, no effect on her gait or skeleton - and no treatments. We had letters from the doctors that said exactly that.
But a year or so later, when we went to get health insurance because I quit my job and we were now both self-employed - my daughter was uninsurable, as we were informed by several companies. Fortunately, in WI the state has private carriers operate an insurance program for "high-risk" people, and so while my wife and I (both overweight smokers approaching our 40s at the time) could get cheap coverage, my daughter's insurance cost more than that for both of us.
We eventually found another company who would cover her with a rider denying any coverage for anything related to her "condition".
My daughter, now almost 20, has never had any treatment for her "condition" - it never stopped her from taking dancing lessons, gymnastics, playing volleyball, backpacking, and even playing rugby for a while last year. She just has one leg that's larger and you probably wouldn't even notice if you didn't know, but it's made her a "high-risk" person. I've told her to never mention it when she applies for insurance on her own.
I have my fears, but they do not have me - Peter Gabriel
by badger on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:09:39 AM PDT
But you know, if she doesn't mention it and they find it in her old records, she could be cancelled for not disclosing it.
The insurance companies get you coming and going. Which is the point. They're TRYING to "get you," not help you avoid financial disaster in case of illness.
by el dorado gal on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:57:49 AM PDT
I'm normally not for dishonesty, but these idiot insurance companies deserve it. A few years back I was self-employed and was trying to buy health insurance. Blue Cross denied me because I had had a sinus infection that past winter. I was only 31 years old, not on any medication, totally healthy, never been hospitalized my whole life. So you know what I did? I called the next day, spoke to a different agent, lied about that sinus infection, and got a PPO for $200 per month.
by sunshineonthebay on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 12:08:51 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 419 comments