View Story | 42 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
... only if it is preceded by a Constitutional amendment overturning Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, abolishing forever the concept of "corporate personhood", and restricting corporate charters for all corporations operating in the United States to no more than 30 years' duration.
Until then, let the corporations pay income taxes like everyone else.
We can go a lot farther a lot faster toward dealing with the George Bush War Profiteering Debt by taking the following steps (where I give numbers, recognize that they are back-of-the-envelope numbers, adjust as necessary as long as the principle is maintained), starting with the expenditures side:
The prohibition against profiteering must be for all contractors, and at all times, so that military contractors can't claim that they are being unfairly discriminated against.
Then we can go to the revenue side:
After that, the expenditure-side controls would do two things; prevent government contract inflation, and ensure that government expenditures benefit the largest possible number of people, while helping to limit the concentration of wealth in America.
"Without bitterness, all chocolate is a Hershey bar." -- Harry Shearer
by tbetz on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:01:13 AM PDT
particulalrly ending corporate personhood.
by Urizen on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:14:44 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
3a) No government employee may, upon leaving government service, be employed by or receive any thing of value from any government contractor or any subcontractor of any government contractor for a period of 15 years. This will prevent the sort of sweetheart-deal corruption we have seen with Boeing and others, and begin to break the cycle of acquisition corruption so rampant in the Pentagon these days.
by tbetz on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:25:57 AM PDT
What does the 30-year limit do? All that would happen, imo, is a new corporation would form and all the assets of the old corporation transferred to it.
by Politburo on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:31:07 AM PDT
... to ensure that it is being operated in the public interest.
That is, after all, what corporations were supposed to be about.
We need to reclaim the principle that corporations must operate in the public interest, not only in the shareholder's interest.
by tbetz on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 07:55:10 AM PDT
... but who makes the call? Would you want Bush appointees in charge of such decisions?
I won't be complacent this time. Been there, done that, got the orange jumpsuit.
by Nowhere Man on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 08:46:26 AM PDT
... with long staggered terms for commissioners so as to minimize the influence of the pendulum swing of politics.
Most of the work could continue to be done by the State charter commissions, which would need to bring their corporation law into line with the new Federal law that supersedes theirs. The Federal commission would be charged with supervising the state chartering bodies, to ensure compliance with Federal law.
It can be done.
by tbetz on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:07:52 AM PDT
You've got it . . . . the "price" for eliminating corporate income tax must be eliminating corporate "personhood". And for the "stockholders" treat income from their corporate equity like any other gambling debt . . . straight income tax for the gains, no "deduction" for the losses. Want "limited liability"? There's a price . . .
Oh, and make all income (interest, dividends and "capital gain" as well as "wages") FICA income, with no "cap" . . .
by Deward Hastings on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:10:46 AM PDT
... a no-brainer, really.
by tbetz on Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:18:56 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 42 comments