Well written.

How anyone who has paid attention the last seven years could not see this is beyond me. I saw Webb make a great point regarding this vote. If the IRG is in fact conducting military operations against our troops, or even supporting those operations. They are not terrorists, they are in fact enemy combatants.

All the supporters, and apoligists for this vote would do well to remember their words when this administration uses this as an excuse. My other veiw is the apologists saying this vote means nothing is, if it had enough to pass then why even register a vote?

To use this vote as a preparation for the GE, to not be called "soft" on defense, is offensive as that would be to assume there will be a coronation  of the party. This sort of thing makes one wonder, do the Clintons know something the rest of us don't? The rumors of disturbing the primary process are there, how far would they be willing to go? Has an election ever been stolen?  

Thanks.