View Story | 115 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
for showing the consultants what the Democratic Party is actually all about.
oops. I hope the gate wasn't too expensive.
My blog. Come visit.
by hekebolos on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 03:53:12 PM PDT
So says Bob.
"They blamed it on the Islamic fanatics, at the time. [...] That was when they suspended the Constitution. They said it would be temporary."-Handmaid's Tale
by JLFinch on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:01:09 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Invading his privacy? Who does Bob think he is? Does he truly understand his role? I've got questions.
Things are going to get a lot worse before they get worse. ~ Lily Tomlin
by vigilant meerkat on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:33:13 PM PDT
I caught that, too. If he didn't want his privacy invaded, he should have kept his ass at home rather than mingling with "the public".
What a jerk.
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. ~Mark Twain
by TexH on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:36:44 PM PDT
and is too clueless to realize it
John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:24:01 PM PDT
Is his behavior typical of state party leaders across the country?
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government....President Bush has repeatedly violated the law for six years." Al Gore
by psnyder on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 07:25:12 PM PDT
I'm commenting before reading the diary, but wanted to let you know I'm here in your town, right now. :)
Had to wait half the day to see the sun I've been missing up in Seattle, but it's there!!
I'll give ya a call in a bit!
"Change is the constant, the signal for rebirth, the egg of the phoenix."
-Christina Baldwin
by Erevann on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:04:25 PM PDT
how long will you be around for?
by hekebolos on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:06:54 PM PDT
to push it out another day or two. Sitting here catching up with my pal Nikki from high school back in CT 15 years ago. It's a trip!
We're about 8 mi north of the airport on National. Don't know where you're at around here, but if you're nearby and it's possible, dinner's on me! :)
by Erevann on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:10:55 PM PDT
And bonus points for food!
Bob Brigham Blog
by blogswarm on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:20:21 PM PDT
Always a religious experience! hehe
by Erevann on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:29:22 PM PDT
and tonight's pretty full up--but what about tomorrow?
by hekebolos on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:28:58 PM PDT
and since when was a public process of government and party is considered a matter of "privacy" in the course of the process?
This guy seems like the epitome of the problem with the party establishment...
ohhhh... the battle is ON! Go get em buddy!
by Erevann on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:08:31 PM PDT
When I heard the guy say "worse than Bush" I was just like, "Oh shit! Oh no you didn't!"
What a gigantic ass.
"Not just with words, but with deeds." -- Barack Obama
by kath25 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:14:36 PM PDT
about it, then he's got a much more serious problem than he realizes...
He's become the dead weight, that's been dragging this party down and effectively handed this country to the Republicans since Reagan.
He's lost perspective and has no vision. Is it about simply winning elections now? That's what it sounds like he's thinking.
Screw principle, values, ideals, forget the visionary dreams of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the determination of the founders of this nation.
No, winning the elections is all that matters...
no matter HOW badly we have to compromise our most treasured beliefs...
Fuck you Bob, you sold out, get the hell out of the way.
That goes for you too Carville, From, Begalia, etc ad nauseum. All you guys are doing is dragging this party and this country down.
Enough of these fools.
by Erevann on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:28:34 PM PDT
How does the Republican Party base (which IS fringe and lunatic and pre-nursing home as compared to the average American) get ALL their party's attention and our(?) party can't distance themselves enough from us?
Lawrence O'Donnell said on KO last night, "There really isn't anywhere for the party progressives to go. They will have to support the Dem party". Is that what they really think? O'Donnell went on about how Hillary is right about "not enough votes" for Iraq and restated the 60 vote rule (that consultants made up),blah, blah, blah. These insiders and consultants have got to be shoved out before we can get ANYWHERE.
Barack Obama - I'll never see the threat of terrorism as a way to scare up votes, it's a threat that should rally this country against our common enemies
by madgranny on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:32:20 PM PDT
They view this as a battle with US, not a battle for the party and the base. Amazing. They're the ones who can't get there from here. They're pull date is up, and they need to go.
by vigilant meerkat on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:37:12 PM PDT
the only real questions are:
If your answer is "let's help them", vote the straight Democratic ticket and let them in front of the American people without a Bush in the White House to give them cover for their running America according to the orders of the "real people represented by K Street" (i.e. Fortune 1000 CEOs).
IMO, this election is the last hurrah for the triangulators.
Unless they can manage to wring defeat from the jaws of victory yet again, they're going to have to either cut their corporate donors loose or govern openly in their names. I confidently expect them to manage to screw up on both ends, i.e. both piss off their donors and the great majority of Americans at the same time.
When it's early 2010 and the American people find out that H/hillarycare means $2K / family member out of our own pockets, nothing much has changed in Iraq, and our jobs are still getting offshored, does anyone think that "we must stick together to stop the GOP" is going to cut any ice with anyone anywhere?
Looking for intelligent energy policy alternatives? Try here.
by alizard on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 08:04:20 PM PDT
GOP politics is just different. Party leadership doesn't respond to constituent pressure as much as they pick the tension-spots that will always exist in a diverse democracy and then tell their base that one point of view is what "real Americans" think and whip them into a frenzy under the false pretense that whatever the issue is can be "fixed".
Immigration is a good example here. Undocumented immigration from Mexico has been more-or-less unchanged in our lifetimes. Yet, to hear the GOP tell it, its an unprecedented crisis of epic proportions that must be "fixed" right now.
The difference between the parties boils down to the difference between sales and marketing. Dems do sales. They try to figure out what people want and then craft ways to meet the need. The GOP does marketing. They gin up artificial needs based on their existing product.
Thus, the perception that the GOP base is "getting what it wants" is an illusion. They are just getting what they've already been sold.
The goal is not to bring your adversaries to their knees but to their senses. -- Mahatma Gandhi
by kingubu on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:11:34 PM PDT
And it disgusted me. O'Donnell's attitude was patronizing enough, but I also detected a hint of exasperation in his voice, as if we were misbehaving children who were embarrassing him in public despite his best efforts.
by eightlivesleft on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 06:19:47 PM PDT
saying about the activists they'd pissed off even before people like Abraham Lincoln, their IL State Party Chairman walked out on them.
The Democratic / Whig path can be summarized as:
What issue is most likely to persuade low-information Democrats from joining the rush to the exits in 2010?
Probably generic hillarycare which is already going off the rails in MA, which our local "Democratic" leaders want to unload on us in California, and which all three major Democratic candidates + Dodd want to push down the throats of the whole nation.
If the discovery from a postcard issued by the new Federal or CA hillarycare bureaucracy like this:
meaning that we MUST buy Federally (or state) approved private health care insurance doesn't get the truth across to the low-information Democratic voter that the elected part of the Democratic Party is not on our side. . . forget organized progressive political action, it'll be time for us to look for individual strategies for the future; find a way to survive America sliding into the toilet or look for somewhere else to live.
by alizard on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 07:57:31 PM PDT
You wear that to all of your meetings, don't you! :-)
by kath25 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:12:50 PM PDT
I may, but I'm not even in that video! Wish I were, though. I missed that e-board meeting because I was liveblogging the global warming forum.
by hekebolos on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:20:21 PM PDT
in the background behind the woman trying to start the motion to bypass the bylaw or something?
by kath25 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:21:09 PM PDT
Yeah, guess that wasn't you if you weren't even there. You have a doppleganger.
by kath25 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:21:28 PM PDT
to spot Brian Leubitz aka sfbriancl wins a prize :)
by juls on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:42:09 PM PDT
Do I have to spot him at the table or can I spot him slumped against a wall?
by withthelidoff on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:54:37 PM PDT
withthelidoff spotted both appearances by Brian and wins the prize. A pat on the back next time I see him.
Or maybe a beer. But he will have to remind me.
by juls on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:58:29 PM PDT
or a beer on the back. Don't think I'll forget free booze.
by withthelidoff on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:09:19 PM PDT
I figured as much.
by juls on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:10:07 PM PDT
if you look really closely the timing on both cameras are lined up, so you can actually see Mulholland walking towards our camera in the background right before he blocks it.
by juls on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:17:10 PM PDT
Clintonistas for Obama
by atdnext on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 04:49:19 PM PDT
Nice implied ageism and/or dismisal by implication of mental illness in defense of the 74 year-old Sen. Feinstein.
John McCain
by joejoejoe on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 05:22:39 PM PDT
or 90 year old Senator Byrd- who was opposed to this Attorney General.
You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. Aldous Huxley
by murrayewv on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 08:01:07 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 115 comments