View Story | 381 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
I don't know the technicalities involved, but Kucinich is a serious candidate.
by emmabrody on Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:26:31 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
damn office in the damn state, and the K-man didn't.
Cats, err, Pooties! for Obama
by PhillyGal on Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:28:48 PM PDT
not all of the Candidates take campaign donations from every Tom, Dick and Rupert that comes along, and they have to watch every expenditure.
To exclude a legal candidate from a debate, on the grounds of "how they choose to spend their campaign funds" is dishonest, pathetic, and about as "against the Constitution" as BushCO is.
On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place
by o the umanity on Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:39:06 PM PDT
Which seems a bit arbitrary to me.
They should definitely let Dennis in the debate. His views are a breath of fresh air, and as others have stated, are as truly progressive as you will find.
However, while Dennis has great principles and a great perseverence and sense of justice, he is not a good manager. Until he becomes a better manager, he should not be President because he'll set back the progressive cause for years.
PATRIOT I+II, MCA, FISA CAPITULATION, NOW TORTURE. YOUR COUNTRY IS SLOWLY BEING DISMANTLED. WHAT R U GONNA DO ABOUT IT?
by maxschell on Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:39:36 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 381 comments