View Story | 126 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
in Russian history, or the first part of the twentieth century in China?
"We must become the change we want to see." -Gandhi PublicChristian.com
by larryrant on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 07:06:48 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
The Spelling & Syntax police just issued you a citation
Good-o on the rest of this post, tho
If Liberals really hated America we'd vote Republican
by exlrrp on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 07:42:22 AM PDT
and anarchic does not seem powerful enough
yeah, I know, that's a weak cover for a silly mistake, but I tried :-)
and at least it was not part of the diary. But since it is a comment I can't go back and fix it. Oh well . . .
do we still have a Republic and a Constitution if our elected officials will not stand up for them on our behalf?
by teacherken on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 07:45:29 AM PDT
the eye.
We're doing it. Corporatism is the word on everyone's lips these days. And oddly enough, we're even starting to hear about it on CNN and MSNBC.
John Edwards has made it the focus of our collective anger. He's brought the word into our households and awakened so many. Voters are feeling empowered for the first time.
The Bush administration, in all its rot, has shone a light into this nightmare.
Many others have gone before Edwards, speaking out.
But as Ralph Nader said, Edwards is the first mainstream candidate he's seen in years to put forth progressive postitions.
Hillary and Obama are starting to get it and trying to play catch-up, but that may not be enough.
by emmabrody on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 10:56:45 AM PDT
Anarchic just has a higher valence than anarchous.
It's all rusted up while anarchous is still a bit more young and fresh.
(Yeah, it's a chemistry joke.)
John McCain: Untested, untried, unreasonable, and unpresidential. Thank you General Clark!
by cville townie on Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 04:53:26 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 126 comments