View Story | 17 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
to masquarade as news channels.
Reinstating the fairness doctrine will not address this. There should to be standards for calling a station a news station.
First, the content deciders (be they publishers or managing editors) must be professionals, not party hacks and former speech writers.
Second, "contributors" need to disclose their 3 main sources of income. Those paid by think tanks need to disclose the sources of the think tank's income.
Third, there needs to be some standard of fact checking. Too many factual errors or egregious omissions and its labeled an opinion, not a news channel.
by inHI on Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 12:19:32 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Running against Herb "WIRETAP" Kohl in 2012. $1/year. Cash preferred. Masel4Senate 1214 E. Mifflin, Madison, WI 53703
by ben masel on Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 12:48:38 AM PDT
Like in your own town, in the global village, you need to know who is talking to you.
by inHI on Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 11:11:54 PM PDT
"This is Fox News."
And to impose a licensing authority to decide who is a professional, by implication denying a forum to anyone you deem not a professional.
Also, anomymous speech is protected in the village. McIntyre v Ohio Elections Commission.
by ben masel on Tue Dec 25, 2007 at 11:39:32 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 17 comments