View Story | 41 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
to refuse passing a budget at all unless Bush agreees to withdraw on a timetable. But that's some serious Hardball, and could easily cost us the Congress.
Daily Kos used to be worthwhile.
by andgarden on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 04:28:02 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
If the story is correctly managed, you know "We are doing what the American public asked us to do, so we are responding in kind", there should be nothing but positives. From our side of the aisle.
Wingnuts are not voting for our candidates anyway, and since they are about 35% of the electorate...I think we can chance doing what is right for once.
Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21
by funluvn1 on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 04:33:34 AM PDT
Last week, during the Moveon-sponsored letter drop at Ms. McCollum's local office, her aide stated that Ms. McCollum did not support de-funding the war because it would put in jeopardy a number of Democratic seats in the House in '08. Ms. McCollum has been the staunchest of the staunch against this war from the very beginning. If Ms. McCollum won't vote for taking away the funding, you can bet that almost nobody will.
by feelingsickinMN on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 06:34:00 AM PDT
Ms. McCollum does not stand for ending the war.
She may have good reasons in her mind, but that is the bottom line.
Let's Go Gators!
by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 06:51:08 AM PDT
sit-in every single Tuesday in Betty's local office by constituents trying to convince Ms. McCollum to cut off the funding. Maybe we will have some impact, but maybe not. Sigh.
by feelingsickinMN on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 07:05:34 AM PDT
idea works for her.
by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 08:22:36 AM PDT
above! Ms. McCollum shall receive a copy in her in box next Tuesday morning.
Here's my problem at the moment, though. I am one of what many on this site call a "purist." I am in favor of cutting the funding today, and redeploying the troops TODAY. I do not consider myself a purist in this, I consider myself an optimist. But I am getting less optimistic with each passing day.
How strong is opposition to the Iraq war in this country? The lukewarm response for calls to action over the last four years is not exactly encouraging on that front. So Ms. McCollum may be correct in her assessment that the majority of voters would like to see an end to the war, but aren't convinced that defunding it is the best way to do that, or indeed, that there is any urgency about ending the war, as long as we get around to ending it "sometime soon."
Let's just take one example of lukewarm antagonism to the war: there was a very-well publicized protest against the surge in January. It was nation-wide. For the protest in St. Paul, MN, approximately 50 people showed up. Within two miles of this protest are five private colleges. The UofM is less than three miles away, with 40K+ students. In fact, one of the private colleges, with a reputation for liberalism, is less than two blocks away. Not one student showed up. Not one. 99% of those protesting were over fifty years of age. What are our senators and representatives seeing, then: they are seeing a very, very small number of aging people who are upset about the war. Very, very small.
It's discouraging.
by feelingsickinMN on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:28 AM PDT
The American people want this war to end. Nonbinding resolutions won't do that. De-funding might.
by Mia Dolan on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 07:57:36 AM PDT
More questioning of that her -- such as whether there are certain conditions under which she would support defunding -- might change that to a "leans yes."
If somebody writes a book and doesn't care for [its] survival, he's an imbecile.~ Umberto Eco
by Major Danby on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:38:44 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 41 comments