Daily Kos

View Story | 86 comments

  •  Hmmm (6+ / 0-)

    Results from the all-mail, advisory election may give momentum to backers of a non-highway, "surface-transit" option, in which thousands of commuters would shift to buses, water taxis, bicycles and rail.

    Yeah I'm sure this will happen, just like recycling would be the big tide in the turning against pollution. I give credit to the people for not allowing the government to run wild with their money, but a solution is going to need to be found.

    •  call me idealistic (5+ / 0-)

      but given that gas prices have skyrocketed more than 30cents a gallon in the last two weeks in the Seattle area, I really think we need to take a good hard look at transit options that encompass more commuter possibilities such as bus, rail (g*d forbid) van and car pool and bicycling.

      Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam

      by moe99 on Tue Mar 13, 2007 at 09:11:56 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  That is the solution (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      RosyFinch, sldulin

      We need to be planning not for tomorrow, but for 20 and 30 years down the line. Instead of wasting money on obsolete structures for cars, why not use this as an opportunity to spend the money to start developing truly alternative forms of transportation in this city?

      Seattle voters are in the right place on this. Too bad our crappy leaders haven't listened.

      I'm not part of a redneck agenda - Green Day
      Neither is California High Speed Rail

      by eugene on Tue Mar 13, 2007 at 09:36:01 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Seattle is a great city (0+ / 0-)

      nice to see them leading the way.

      Think Tank. "A place where people are paid to think by the makers of tanks" Naomi Klein.

      by ohcanada on Tue Mar 13, 2007 at 09:58:15 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Tacoma and Vancouver (5+ / 0-)

      will love to have the extra port activity, with Seattle being totally clogged with traffic.

      By the time the light rail line is up and running, 14 years will have passed since the final yes vote. The monorail was killed on the fourth time at the polls. How long will we have to wait before we can come to a meeting of minds on transportation problems around here?

      What is the alternative? Mass transit? What's the plan? And who's going to give up their car? Not everyone works downtown. What about the folks that just want to get from the top of the state to the bottom, or vis-versa?

      The "Seattle Way" just sucks. We can't do anything here.

      •  hate to say it, but (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        bleeding blue

        Seattle is having a 'crisis of confidence' now. The big challenges, the viaduct and 520, just seem too daunting, the leadership isn't exactly inspiring and the will of the electorate has been rather incoherent. The major decisions affecting the future of Seattle right now are going to be made in Olympia.

        •  Good, (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          phenry

          maybe Oly can put a plan together that will work. A surface option is a detriment to the state as a whole. This is not just about Seattle. If we can't solve this, other forces will.

          I admire Mayor Nickels' efforts to "green" Seattle, but the regional economy will continue, if Seattle chooses not to be the engine, then that mantle go to the city that can deal realistically with transportation issues.

          If that economic action goes elsewhere, then there might be no traffic problems here in Seattle.

View Story | 86 comments