View Story | 29 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
It will join the seven hundred other statements his tools have drafted previously.
Bush can't afford to turn down the 126 billion. He might not get anything like that much on a second go round. We will see his typical weaselly statement.
"The unitary executive,in the performance of His Duties, will not be constrained by the words of the legislative branch circumscribing the monies paid over for mywar."
When you talk about performing duty in that tone you are talking about a two year old taking a dump. That is the entire attitude of the Deciderer about America. He dumps or steps on us every day.
With luck his lickspittle lackey Abu (Fredo) Gonzalez will get impeached first, then he and his pal Dick can stroll hand in hand to the same place Clinton did and face the wrath of Congress.
Only it won't be about firing over a dry cleaning a blue dress but setting in motion a historic impeachment removal for high treason. If the vote is yes,
Criminal charges to follow AFTER the pair of losers go the Hague. A conviction there will help America's image as a nation governed by just laws, not simply by despots in cowboy boots, brandishing defibrillators.
McCain: Unlike Republicans, (most)he HAS dropped bombs on a people and country that did not attack America. It fits: Warmonger
by Pete Rock on Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 11:02:25 PM PDT
Bush either vetoes the bill, subsequently vetoing funding the troops, which he can't do.
Or he signs off on the bill, allowing the appropriations while simultaneously recognizing Congress' power to legislate above and beyond the unitary executive. It means Bush is not untouchable.
Of course, we know this but sometimes certain steps are needed to break through that facade.
My signature beat up your signature.
by Stand Strong on Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 11:07:16 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
wide narrow
View Story | 29 comments