I meant, as in how Marx is to be read, as a historian or as an economist?

And yes, those of us into... interdisciplinarity, do indeed tend to heart our Gramsci... to whatever degree... though that doesn't always translate into a mention by name. Thus the conclusion of your boldness. Generally, I find that G's more like... invoked, when one wants to "do" hegemony for a moment, like one invokes Foucault before going all "body" on something, for example. On the way to somewhere else, undoubtedly.

Or so it seems to me.

BTW, I hear some of the anarchos are out to "get" Gramsci now, as one of the largest remaining red threats to, um.... anarcho hegemony, let's say, on the far left.

But will that help get Dems elected? :-)

Stay tuned to... As the Thread Turns!