Daily Kos

View Story | 179 comments

  •  Ah... (2+ / 0-)

    Of course, most of the soldier didn't volunteer such remarks and probably considered themselves charitable to the Palestinians, given the circumstances. One soldier who detained us for half an hour bragged about all the food and medicine he'd allowed through. He couldn't understand what the Palestinians were still complaining about. I asked him where he was from.

    "Tel Aviv."

    "So if armed Palestinians invaded Tel Aviv, shut the entire population in their homes, and allowed aid workers to bring around food and medicine, you wouldn't complain?"

    He said that was different. I asked how. He changed the subject. I asked him how long he was going to punish my colleague and me by detaining us on the street. He said he wasn't punishing us, that we just had to wait a little while, which was normal. I asked:

    "So if armed Palestinians stopped you outside your house, demanded your ID, and prevented you from going to work, you would consider that normal?" He changed the subject again.

    An interesting conversation, indeed. Cognitive dissonance is indeed a universal affect.

    ...i realize now / you were not to be blamed, my love / you didn't choose your name, my love...

    by Diaries on Mon May 14, 2007 at 07:31:47 AM PDT

    •  Except that Anna is not a Palestinian (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      unfounded, MBNYC, jhritz

      resident and her movement can be properly restricted by the competent administering authority of the foreign country.

      •  Anna never called herself a Palestinian. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        mattes

        And the dissonance rang loudly in their exchanges :^)

        ...i realize now / you were not to be blamed, my love / you didn't choose your name, my love...

        by Diaries on Mon May 14, 2007 at 10:02:51 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I didn't say that she called herself one (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          MBNYC, jhritz

          The point is comparing her (a foreigner) being restricted in movement in the West Bank (a foreign country) and an Israeli being restricted in movement in his own country is pretty ludicrious.

          •  Nope... (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            mattes

            ...she wasn't the only one whose movements were restricted that day (obviously). She was traveling with Palestinians, and they all got to watch the soldier's head explode while he tried justifying the unjustifiable. What's good for unarmed Palestinians at the mercy of armed Israelis suddenly becomes unacceptable vis-a-vis unarmed Israelis at the mercy of armed Palestinians? Who would'a thunk it!

            ...i realize now / you were not to be blamed, my love / you didn't choose your name, my love...

            by Diaries on Mon May 14, 2007 at 10:14:43 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  The more interesting conversation (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Cecrops Tangaroa, unfounded, jhritz

      is the one where she sits down with members of Al Aqsa. That's a terrorist group - no ifs, ands or buts about it, no hyperbole, nothing. That's what they are, per the Department of State. This diary needs to be yanked. Now. We're not going to get a lot of Democrats elected if people post their happy coffee klatches with terrorists on this site.

      Now I suppose someone's going to say I'm intolerant of other viewpoints and just want to squelch debate.

      And there we are, the beautiful; eating from TV trays, tuned in to Happy Days.

      by MBNYC on Mon May 14, 2007 at 02:23:43 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

View Story | 179 comments