for example:

There is still zero empirical evidence that anthropogenic production of CO2 is making any measurable contribution to the world's present warming trend.

and

Thus it is impossible to assert that the increase in atmospheric CO2 stems from human burning of fossil fuels.

and

It's a notorious inconvenience for the Greenhousers that data also show carbon dioxide concentrations from the Eocene period, 20 million years before Henry Ford trundled his first model T out of the shop, 300-400 per cent higher than current concentrations.

There are many more things in his screed which are gross distortions at best.

You write:

Perhaps one day the consensus will switch and say that CO2 is an effect of warming & not a cause; and the cause is actually solar activity.  It doesn't really matter to me, as long as it scares people & corporations into cleaning up their wasteful, poisonous habits.

But that's not possible at all, since the facts contradict this hypothesis, as I pointed out in the diary.  No amount of wishing will make a contrafactual hypothesis anything other than garbage.