Daily Kos

View Story | 77 comments

  •  that is my greatest fear for my friends. (11+ / 0-)

    both are linguists - fairly critical fields - but that said, if the military runs out of guns - they will decide that they can "train more" down the road.

    what happens when we run out of soldiers?  who will be left to fight?

    •  my greatest fear too (8+ / 0-)

      honestly, I don't think we'll ever "run out of soldiers" but I think the closer we get to that point, the more shady things are going to be.  sure, there's already "private security firms" doing military work, but if we get to a point where the military is severely depleted, I think you'll see a couple of things, in this order.

      1. way more money being spent on recruitment...ridiculous amounts, not only in advertising but in enlistment bonuses, etc.
      1. eventually, the government will see the cost per recruit will be too high, and they'll even start contracting recruitment out.  paying private firms to do the recruiting and such, with government bonuses paid to firms who a) recruit the most b) recruit the best and c) retain the most/best.

      The whole goal of our military excursion in Iraq and everything since has been to toss massive amounts of money into the private sector benefactors who are friends and supporters of this administration.  Eventually (and I'd be surprised if I'm the first to have this idea) they'll find a way to make money off of military recruiting.

    •  Dear Edrie, (8+ / 0-)

      My SSG son ran an Afghani National Army Depot near Kabul from July 2005-July 2006.  He had several Navy swabbies assigned to him with no mechanical training.  It accounted for the number of boots on the ground and was frustrating for all.  It is like Bushco is still playing with all of their "little plastic" military guys from childhood and throwing them in a pile.  Our experienced "grunts" are waiting (extending one year at a time, no bonuses) or quitting.  They expect our Congress to do their oversight job of exposing and removing the Bushco Cabal from office for their massive War Profiteering and their War Crimes that they committed in Afghanistan and Iraq. (including Cheneys secret business deals with Pakistan) Our "grunts" expect our Congress to do their GOD DAMNED job instead of threatening to do it!  love, mjd

    •  i can't imagine them placing (7+ / 0-)

      linguists in combat duties.

      Linguists are in short supply, require lengthy and difficult training, and tend to be specialized for a certain type of brains that does not tend to go along with the extraordinary physical stamina needed to be engaged in combat in a place where the temperature is 115 in the shade.

      Linguists could be taken out of other geographic areas and moved to Iraq, and then moved closer to the front in other intel assignments, all of which are increasing degrees of risk.  

      ---

      As for the draft:  Bush will leave the military completely broken, so that the task of calling up a draft falls to the Democratic president who we'lll all be electing next year.  

      The thing that most infuriates me about the present Regime is what it has done to our military and intel capabilities.  They couldn't have done worse if they were actively and deliberately working for the enemy.  

      If there is any way to make them all serve time behind bars, we should be pursuing it ferociously: now, next year, and even after these bastards are out of office.  

      •  i agree with you about jail time - they are (6+ / 0-)

        the true traitors to this nation and the american soldiers and population!

        as for sending linguists - the one who ended up in the army was "silly" enough not to reenlist - so he was fresh meat for the grinder.

        still, with this group - it is the numbers game - look at who is serving - the number of reservists who are older - not fit, the younger injured who cannot wear body armor and are still sent back - the inexperienced and untrained from other branches in areas that are outside their training... this is NOT about "winning" this "war" - it is about sustaining it long enough to rake in the ungodly profits for the contract companies.

        this is a numbers game - much like viet nam was in the end.  it is all in the numbers - not the humanity, skill or capability.  soldiers are expendable.  there are more where they came from - and if you can keep filling the slots - you never have to say you're sorry (wrong).

      •  Believe it. It's happening. (4+ / 0-)

        I know several linguists who have been in, or are going to, Iraq. These are the top 1% in amount and cost of training in the military! Many of them scored so high on the military entrance exams that they are not allowed to join as simply riflemen. And today they're valued as nothing more than:
        one (1) pair of boots with one (1) M-16 rifle, expendable

        •  this is where we, on the outside, need to start (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          fallina7

          hammering our representatives about the waste in "money" - since that is all many of them seem to understand!

          the vulnerability of the republicans lies in the pocketbook - if we make the population know that they are paying massive amounts to train people to protect us and then those people are being thrown away to keep bush looking "good" - then 2009 will be a rude awakening for ALL republicans running for office!

          •  Excellent point. (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            edrie

            It's a waste of money and an insanely stupid waste of resources.

            My nephew is in the Naval Reserve and is currently serving in Iraq.  His years of training on aircraft carriers won't be of much value in the desert.  

View Story | 77 comments