View Story | 22 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
Out of all this colony collapse crisis management, I guess that overall better beekeeping practices will develop. People have been keeping bees for a very long time, and they have been doing agriculture for a very ling time. Still, the industrialization of the past century has brought along some negative consequences (along with way lower prices), and some of them are only now starting to show up, like topsoil erosion, contamination of the food supply with other industrial waste streams, and the disease risk associated with monoculture. I truly appreciate that the article is skewed, and I didn't write it. I think that it's an interesting piece of the puzzle, that's all. There are no easy answers here, and it's clear that something isn't working. Maybe agribusiness didn't cause this, but adaptation is necessary.
McCain is a Chode.
by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 05:33:55 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Your reply is very kind in response to the other concepts mentioned.
However, if you look at what monoculture has done to forest tracts, the giant pig farms, huge swaths of mono-cropping, etc. -- all have huge environmental effects.
The idea that we can erase the bio-diversity of nature and bear no consequences... really doesn't make sense. The idea that there will be a cost for mono-cropping, whether of crops or bees, does seem natural.
Be good to each other. It matters.
by AllisonInSeattle on Thu May 10, 2007 at 10:42:46 PM PDT
after the fact. I think that agribusiness was a perfectly reasonable experiment to try, but we must recognize failure when we see it.
by dnamj on Fri May 11, 2007 at 02:11:55 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 22 comments