View Story | 260 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
typing this out on a snow day in the middle of children asking for endless cups of juice - sorry for any typos/grammar errors :)
"The revolution's just an ethical haircut away..." Billy Bragg
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:19:16 AM PDT
It isn't fair to have snow days after the kids JUST went back to school from winter break. ; )
Support the Troops. End the War.
by chuckles1 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:23:43 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
...my daughter doesn't nap - lol!
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:24:53 AM PDT
O - 32 C - 30 E - 27
Edwards is NOT done by a long shot.
Visit EENR blog for Progressives
by pioneer111 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:47:36 AM PDT
but after last week I decided to pay no attention to polls. They're clearly crap. Too many people from the media and other organizations are trying to manipulate this election. So, I do like seeing those numbers but I have to take them with a big grain of salt :)
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson
by joanneleon on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:50:44 AM PDT
a grain of salt. Edwards was in third place in 2004 and ended up winning.
There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious...that you've got to put your bodies on the gears...and make it stop. -- Mario Savio
by Boston Boomer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:55:16 AM PDT
What really matters is whether or not people will stick with their candidate through their primary.
There is a lot of train jumping going on, and it's odd, because Edwards is clearly a viable candidate in both Nevada and SC. Polls show a three way tie, basically, when you factor in that Grain of Salt moe.
Edwards needs the votes of all Edwards supporters, and of any other undecided candidate who would like to see this debate continue.
Go John!
by kate mckinnon on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:57:39 AM PDT
I took a long time in making my choice. Now I'm sticking with Edwards.
by joanneleon on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:59:06 AM PDT
Why would I switch now, when he articulates exactly what I want to hear on most issues?
I'm not one of the "Caving Dems", who cower and 'give in' to some predicted inevitability that ain't inevitable.
The future's unpredictable. I'm working for the one I want, for me, my kids, and us all.
Remember Nataline.
by means are the ends on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:22:21 AM PDT
be emulating out democratic congresscritters. No spines at all.
Patriotism may be the last refuge of scoundrels, but religion is assuredly the first.
by StrayCat on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 01:35:25 PM PDT
as well. These 'cowering Dems' are acting just like the Congressional Dems who claim they have no choice but to give in to Bush because... otherwise, he'll be mean to them?
The reasons for abandoning a candidate now are just about as good, to my ears, as the rationale I hear out of the Capitol.
EENR blog, a progressive community focused on issues with a side of fun
by edgery on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:50:33 PM PDT
The convention is months and months away!
by liberalactivist on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:18:09 AM PDT
than people who go with the wind, whichever way it blows. we need to stand by and support JRE until he wins.
A billion here and a billion there, and soon you're talking about real money. Everett Dirksen
by Sargent Pepper on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:26:12 AM PDT
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:22:35 AM PDT
I want Edwards to stay in for the long haul. I hope he means it when he says he will.
by Boston Boomer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:53:55 AM PDT
Clinton and Obama have pumped into Nevada those numbers are somewhat shocking!
"People die. Strategies fail. Blame is laid. And we, as a nation, are made to look like assholes." - Brandon Friedman
by Militarytracy on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:10:18 AM PDT
these numbers are not on pollster.com and I have a hard time believing it is that close.
by dan667 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:12:24 AM PDT
New poll in Nevada
and for more information see this Nevada Race a 3 Way Statistical Tie - Edwards a Very Close 3rd
by pioneer111 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:20:39 AM PDT
I slept, the kids played quietly in their rooms. Because I was exhausted! This only works with certain kids; and if you stock their "naptime" with lots of special fun stuff they don't get any other time.... and that can't get them into any trouble!
by means are the ends on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:19:50 AM PDT
my son generally nods right off...my daughter? It's very, very unusual for her to nap. I generally try to have some quiet time activities for her.
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:25:15 AM PDT
I would make a "safe room" No electrical cords, no tiny things. I would sleep across the door and he would play quietly. Sleep deprivation is a means of torture.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
by empathy on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 01:54:14 PM PDT
if you're the KID. I remember well what it was like. Not only did I love the snow - and still do - the joy of an unexpected day to be out in it was unalloyed.
Your diary is wonderful. Not at all unlike two new feet of snow.
(ducks and runs)
You can't always tell the truth because you don't always know the truth - but you can ALWAYS be honest.
by mattman on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 12:57:32 PM PDT
of the best candidate in the race.
by ceenatoli on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:28:15 AM PDT
This is the kind of diary and discussion that I keep looking for here. I still have time to make my choice and now that one of my favorites, Dodd, is gone, my choice will be a process of elimination. I want a President who will make good, solid choices for the majority of Americans, get us out of Iraq and repair our economy and our image abroad. Dodd stood up to Reid and the Republicans against the Telecommunications bill. I was sorry to see him withdraw but I am glad he is still in the Senate. It would be nice to see Clinton and Obama take some tough stands against these bill that are trampling our Constitution. Edwards is a good man and would make a fine President. Although his Senate record is not as progressive as I would like, I think he has learned from his past and would not make the same mistakes. I would like to see the personal rhetoric die down and have the candidates get back to the issues, like your diary. Thanks from the undecided.
"By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes" Wm. Shakespeare, "Macbeth"
by TheMomCat on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:31:19 AM PDT
Primaries are for voting your heart. I do hope we get back to the issues soon...
...although not before we get statements from the campaigns regarding their take on the latest from Brittney Spears (/snark)
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:39:49 AM PDT
Followed by Clinton (Obama took himself off my list.)
I'm getting ready to fill out my absentee ballot. For sentimental reasons, I would like to vote for Clinton, but I think I'll stick with Edwards.
We have three great candidates and I really can't find enough differences between them to get worked up about--I think we'll be well-served no matter which one is our nominee.
For me, Edwards has been the most articulate about the two Americas and kicking corporate butt. We gave the drug and insurance companies the chance to negotiate during the Clinton administration and they told us to fuck off. Now I want to kick their damn teeth in.
Well Dayum! The Fat Lady just sang her tits right off!
by homogenius on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:49:43 AM PDT
hes fought so hard to push the issues that mater
by BBelle on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:05:38 AM PDT
John needs you!
by demer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:10:43 PM PDT
I would like to see some real, down to earth, practical discussions about these candidates. I'd like to talk about real lives of the majority of people in this country -- the middle class. I'd like to take the emotion out of it and make choices based on reason and results. I want to take the media, Madison Avenue and K Street out of the equation here. They clearly don't have our best interests at heart, yet they have so much influence on a large number of people. 2008 should be the year when America turns a blind eye to these institutions and become exposed for the tools they are.
One of the things I fear most about this election is that we'll end up with buyer's remorse, a la Nov. 2006.
by joanneleon on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:56:39 AM PDT
I'm wondering the same thing.
Will the Dem plans result in a roll back of the exorbitant premiums we pay? I don't have the answer, I don't think any of them have laid out the specifics. If it doesn't involve a roll back until we get to single payer, then WTF?
None of us with with unaffordable junk insurance can pay these choking premiums which will increase another 8-12% next year, and the year after that and so on.
Can someone enlighten us--please?
Tell your healthcare and insurance horror stories at Guaranteed Healthcare
by nyceve on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:49:08 AM PDT
you are on the healthcare front - Edwards plan is to offer affordable government plans that would compete against the for-profit insurers which would/should reduce the premiums. If there was a government plan that would even just cover very basic care and was affordable, I personally would be very happy.
by inclusiveheart on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:02:17 AM PDT
I just want to pay the same premiums as the Congresspeople Congressrats pay.
My Congressman can take the identical insurance as I have.
I pay $650 a month.
He pays somewhere around $172.00 a month.
I just want to pay what he pays, is this going to happen?
by nyceve on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:16:39 AM PDT
when Kerry proposed that all Americans have access to the same health care as our Political Class, during their national debate.
I was so shocked, and couldn't believe that didn't end his candidacy!
What? Only the Aristocrats get health care, and it's too expensive for we peasants who pay their bills?
That's basically what Bush was saying. Everything since then has followed that pattern.
He told us in that one phrase who he was, and what he thought of us:
Let us eat cake, my fellow Americans. Let us eat cake.....
by means are the ends on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:31:06 AM PDT
by inclusiveheart on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:37:53 AM PDT
"Power concedes nothing without a demand." -- Frederick Douglass, 1857
by mickeynATL on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 04:03:58 AM PDT
This peasant was not surprised, for some reason.
Billions for war, not one cent for citizens.
That, along with torture, will be Bush's, and the Repubs' legacy.
by means are the ends on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 07:18:01 AM PDT
I actually think that Edwards public/private idea is pretty brilliant the more I think about how tough a nut this healthcare issue is to crack. As much as I'd like to outlaw private health insurance all togeher (in my more irrational moments at least), I don't think that is possible. Regulating the industry would be subject to change with every Congressional term. So the only other option is to provide competition in their "free market".
by inclusiveheart on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:37:07 AM PDT
in Canada the insurance rates are even lower than $172 although they don't cover quite as much as what is in Edwards plan. They don't cover dental but do cover mental health. So I suspect that insurance rates will be much more affordable with Edwards plan.
by pioneer111 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 10:53:29 AM PDT
Short :) post from Germany here.
We do have publicly owned (no profit) health care funds and privately owned (for profit) health care companies. Heavily regulated and competing against each other.
Guess what, you can force private health care companies to lower their premiums if they have to really compete. You don´t even need single payer for it. (Mind you, I´m not saying that single payer won´t be the best solution anyway.)
$650 a month is too high. $172 probably is too low especially if it includes family members.
I am privately insured in Germany. Around $300 per month. No deductions, nothing excluded (teeth, eyes etc.).
Premium depends on the age you enter private insurance. The younger you are, the lower the entrance premium. Makes sense because younger people don´t need health care that much. And they are required by law to put at least 10% of your premiums into a lookbox. To pay for your probable health care expenses once you´re a senior. Another part of that $300 is the disability/home care insurance. (That´s not social security disability pension. It´s payment for home care - up to a limit - if you are disabled. Accident, age whatever.)
Do I even have to mention that they can´t throw me out?
If I don´t need it for a year, I get a months payment back. Two years, two months. Up to, not used for three years, a three months payment back.
And they pay 210% of what the publicly owned funds pay to doctors. Which makes us very popular with doctors. :)
What I´m trying to say... In Germany private (for profit) health insurance companies (heavily regulated) can - give the same coverage - pay doctors better than publicly owned health funds - and can still make a profit.
Something is really wrong in the US of A.
by Detlef on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 02:04:39 PM PDT
That would be something to look at as well just as long as people don't skip a healthcare appointment at the end of the year just to get the rebate back.
by lenzy1000 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:26:53 PM PDT
Here's the thing: with mandated health care you're pooling risk. With a highly regulated environment for insurance co's to play in (including caps on their profits) it makes them behave like, well, good citizens instead of the mafia.
All of that lowers rates. Subsidies for working folks lowers the rate structure further.
I also love the idea of regional health markets.
I have to do nap time now (my son's getting really fussy), but will be back. In the meantime here's the link to Edwards's health care plan specifics: http://www.johnedwards.com/...
And a big one for me, as my child has mild autism: http://www.johnedwards.com/...
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:37:09 AM PDT
and I hadn't even seen the link on to his autism page. I'm pretty critical about 'autism' plans from candidates. I've a severely autistic sister. She's 42. She'll never be 'cured'. She needs health care and supportive care. Right now NONE of that is provided by the government. None.
I was so glad to read that Edwards plan focuses on the health care and supportive care past 21, as well as all the intervention during school year plans the others do. This man just gets it right. And that's why I'm supporting him as a candidate until HE decides he doesn't need the support.
Because, I have news for everyone. Autism continues after school. It's for life. And intervention in the early years is important, but just as important is support for the rest of an autistics (or indeed anyone with a handicap) life.
My sister has now spent more years OUT of school than in it, and she's only half way through her life. If it weren't for the fact that my parents have dedicated their lives to caring for her...
Well nevermind, we won't go there. I only hope I can find that same dedication when they pass on and I have to take care of my sister. Good luck to you with your son. Some of the best people I know are autistic!
"Keep you doped with religion & sex & TV, & you think you're so clever & classless & free, but you're still f'ing peasants as far as I can see." John Lennon
by sima on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 10:58:59 AM PDT
and just to be clear - my daughter is "on the spectrum", but she doesn't have severe autism, just a speech delay.
But yes - it's important to recognize that this is a lifetime condition, and like so many differently abled folks we need proactive plans that address their needs while continuing to move them into - and not isolate them from - society.
I'm very glad the Edwards plan does just that.
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 11:10:15 AM PDT
For some reason I thought it was your son on the spectrum, not your daughter.
Glad I have that straight now!
by sima on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 11:34:57 AM PDT
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 11:53:57 AM PDT
I'm NW of Boston have we already have about 10 inches. I expect to be shoveling most of the day. Every time I get the end of the driveway cleared, another snowplow comes by and leaves another big mound for me to work on.
I'm sticking with Edwards too. Thanks for a great diary!
by Boston Boomer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:52:53 AM PDT
and off...cross your fingers for me that they let Hubby go home early enough to get here before 10 pm :-)
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:38:05 AM PDT
take care.
by Boston Boomer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 10:03:48 AM PDT
We got rain. Blecchh.
by empathy on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 02:11:19 PM PDT
We have already had way more snow than normal. I'm not looking forward to the next couple of months of shoveling.
by Boston Boomer on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:06:56 PM PDT
it feels like April. It's making me nuts. When people keep saying how much they are enjoying this weather, I just want to shake them.
by empathy on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:48:50 PM PDT
Edwards / Obama '08!
Rick 08 Preference - Obama -9.63 -6.92Fox News - We Distort, You Deride
by rick on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 08:55:42 AM PDT
my one year old naps and my four year old drives his trucks around in a demolition derby. Such a similar story. Thank you for writing my thoughts down for me. :) Amen, grannyhelen. Great diary.
Can you hear my head nodding from here?
I am voting for John Edwards and no-one can stop me!
"Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest." --Ben Franklin
by jm taylor on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 09:11:31 AM PDT
good luck :-)
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 10:37:39 AM PDT
Edwards is not giving up, and I am not either.
Go Edwards!
"I don't belong to any organized party, I'm a Democrat." Will Rogers
by Do Tell on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 10:48:29 AM PDT
I'm with John all the way to the end also. He speaks for me, to me. His campaign's got soul. Give me soul over glitz and power moves any day. Soul is everlasting and infinitely strong. Glitz fades.
Spears/Hilton '08
by cosbo on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 11:24:58 AM PDT
to get their own dang juice!
Kidding! Nicely done, GH! ;-)
This ain't no party. This ain't no disco. This ain't no foolin' around!
by Snud on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 11:55:18 AM PDT
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 12:22:39 PM PDT
I'm in for Edwards until the very end.
He, and only he, knows that corporations have no souls.
There is no table.
by imabluemerkin on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 02:33:35 PM PDT
I feel better already. I realize the man has his limitations as a candidate, but he's caught my sentiments about the federal government head on. He has so many people, though, who viscerally dislike him, sorta like Senator Clinton....
You really a granny??
by jlamkin on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 02:53:43 PM PDT
"grannyhelen" is a tribute to my great granny Helen.
I'm a forty y.o. mom of 2 :)
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 03:09:27 PM PDT
granny!! Please except a humble tip from and Edwards partisan!!
As always, best wishes granny!!!
First and foremost I am an Edwards Democrat!! Support Heather Ryan in Kentucky's First!! http://www.actblue.com/page/americansforryan
by RDemocrat on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 05:15:52 PM PDT
by grannyhelen on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 05:45:46 PM PDT
Thanks for a lovely diary. I don't know about you, but I'm encouraged by the NV polls showing John in a three-way race. I hope he's able to raise that $7 million on Friday. The media will have to take note of that. Dig deep, people.
by mickeynATL on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 04:02:41 AM PDT
I'm very encouraged by that as well.
by grannyhelen on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 05:38:52 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 260 comments