View Story | 920 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
officially part of the Neo-con, Rovian cabal?
Yeah, that's why Howard Dean and the DNC just joined the Culinary Workers union against the Clinton's voter suppression lawsuit in Nevada, a suit Bil was supporting publicly today.
Hard to believe we have people supposedly in this party who will openly attempt voter suppression. They used to be a little more subtle.
Well if they dump Howard Dean, it might just be time to organize a Progressive Party and identify the Republican/Democratic party for what it is - a giant monolith that wants to maintain the status quo in DC.
Maybe it's time for the PPPP - People Powered Progressive Party.
importer
by importer on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 11:10:04 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
If Dean gets thrown out and the establishment takes over I'll have a hard decision to make: Stay a Dem and, with other progressive Dems, try to change the party, or become an independent until a new progressive party is created.
Obama/Richardson's Beard '08!
by Kyle the Mainer on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 11:41:44 AM PDT
within itself.
Not an actual, formal split, but an internal fissure that will be a tug-of-war for the soul of the party.
There will be two wings: the DLC wing and the DFA wing. Howard will go back to DFA, and he and his brother Jim will continue to build their movement from there.
This is going to be a long-term battle folks. I am working for a non-Clinton candidate for precisely that reason. But one thing I learned since I got sucked into all this four years ago, is that you gotta look long-term sometimes. If Clinton gets the nomination and McAuliffe/Ford are installed, it's a setback, but we're just going to have work harder to move our people into the lower levels of the party infrastructure and send our dollars to DFA instead of the DNC.
And if the DLC crowd thinks that they can run a party without us, they've got another thing coming.
Tikkun Olam...Obama '08
by tethys on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:02:49 PM PDT
and look what happened. Going from being best known for their fiscal conservative philosophy to one that is evangelical through and through.
I don't believe something along those religious lines would happen to the Democrats. But, look what happened after Christian Conservatives were considered the base of the Republican Party. Very bad things occurred and still are.
I hope the same doesn't happen to the Democrats or we're in for a long 4 years of Republicans occupying the White House.
Get it together, Democrats, or we're sunk.
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
by Casey on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 01:41:27 PM PDT
The Democratic Party as we know it probably won't exist past 2009 no matter who wins or from which party.
If the GOP wins, and watching the primaries suggests this as a real possibility, I think progressives will walk out on the Democrats on the basis of irrelevance. If Democrats can't win when everyone except the Bush 22%ers knows that the GOP has screwed America up, perhaps terminally, when can Democrats win?
In the event of Democratic victory, elected Democrats have the choice of governing for America or for Hillary's "real people reptesented by K Street", which non-Hillbots recognize as meaning Fortune 1000 C-level people. People weren't noticing that much when the political pork awarded to connected corporations came out of our hides. The next stage is pork taken from our internal organs, and even the low-information voter is going to notice.
If it's late 2009 and
I expect the Democratic Party to go on the rocks Real Soon Now, and it's time for us to start looking at building us a lifeboat... to start looking seriously at the mechanics of building a new progressive party. (somewhere else... thinking small working groupa at the moment)
The time to design and build a lifeboat is before the ship is sinking.
Looking for intelligent energy policy alternatives? Try here.
by alizard on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 02:37:01 PM PDT
:(
by shiobhan on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 03:40:34 PM PDT
I wrote this using the assumption that it is not already too late and that the possibility even exists that the progressive movement can get its collective shit together.
by alizard on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 04:38:59 PM PDT
Two equations rule politics: $$$ = power and influence 0.1% of the richest == 42% of the poorest.
Bush Administration: Proving the saying, "You can fool most of the people some of the time, and 30% 24% 19% all the time."
by Helpless on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 05:03:51 PM PDT
As a senior citizen who has butted their head for 4 years, I'll find other things to do until that new progressive party is created.
by Helpless on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 04:56:42 PM PDT
proposition. It is better to fight for the soul of the Democratic Party and win it back. Don't give up hope and go thru centuries with no power...that's what a third party would give you.
-4.75, -5.33 Cheney 10/05/04: "I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11."
by sunbro on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:26:54 PM PDT
managing a disease - there's no cure, only a treatment and the disease is always trying to come back, and in any moment of weakness, it will put the nation on life support to the point it eventually, like any other parasitic disease, kills the host.
We need some stem cell research for democracy!
"We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek." ~ Barack Obama
by Reality Bites Back on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:59:13 PM PDT
I like your analogy. We can help to prevent the disease by for starters getting rid of corporate money in elections and changing the status of corporate personhood.
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. James Madison
by ScienceMom on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 02:45:11 PM PDT
My ideas:
by Helpless on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 05:11:01 PM PDT
A few more years of "centrist" government, whether delivered by the GOP or the DLC, and America will become a failed theocratic police state ravaged by freak weather which will have become the norm, with an infrastructure decayed beyond use, and a government no longer capable of delivering services. Imagine an America that looks like post-Katrina NOLA.
America's wealth in terms of intellectual property will be expropriated one way or another. Our sub-prime McMansions will be rented to us as they fall apart by foriegn owners who don't care about court orders to maintain their property.
That's simply a linear projection of what current trends look like if nobody stops them. Centrist in this context means "nobody cares, we're here to help the real people represented by K Street".
The concept of generational struggle for the soul of America is completely meaningless. We've got a handful of years to get it right at best. It may already be too late.
No country in history has had the option of staying stupid forever.
by alizard on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 02:47:56 PM PDT
Which went through the same period of stagnation, decline and collapse America is now going through. While the Eastern half survived another thousand years as what we call today the Byzantine Empire, it too fell into stagnation, decay and eventual ruin.
Gravel2008.us | Re-Elect Dennis!
by Archangel M on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 03:22:26 PM PDT
better. There are Roman-built highways that are still in use after 2000 years.
If America goes down the tubes, I doubt any of our roads will still be usable in a generation. Our roads were generally built by the lowest bidder.
by alizard on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 04:36:44 PM PDT
Government and laws are the agreement we all make to secure everyone's freedom.
by Simplify on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 10:05:58 PM PDT
by Reality Bites Back on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:55:09 PM PDT
The Democratic party suffers from the same malaise that's afflicting the Republicans: lack of vision, group think, rigidity, venality, and an apparent inability to change with the exigencies of a new century...a time of massive transformation in all institutions, it seems, but the federal government. Dean gets that, so does Obama and Feingold and pitifully few others. It's astonishing that Bill Clinton, the sharpest bulb in the dusty chandelier, has become like one of the old white guys who persecuted him. A split in the party makes all kinds of sense...but not this year when so much is at stake. Maybe you're right... 2012.
by cas2 on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 06:35:17 PM PDT
Some people apparently haven't learned anything during the last 7 years. 7 years ago there were a lot of people who blamed the Democrats for everything wrong in America. Some of them felt so strongly about this that they voted for Nader (and encouraged others to do so), providing enough votes to tip the scales from a person who would have been a damn good president to a sociopathic fundamentalist who has trashed our nation.
Now, there are a bunch of people (often the same people) claiming that ... the Democrats aren't good enough. I don't know if they are concern trolls or delusional idealists, but every time we start to show signs of unity on dKos, they come out with diaries telling us that we are fools for being unified against the Republican Party, and we should really be fighting members of our own party.
To hell with independents... I'll stick with the party that brought us social security, civil rights, and environmental protection.
by dianem on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 01:36:29 PM PDT
We HAVE to take the nation away from the Republicans ANY way we can.
Brokaw to Matthews -- Wait for voters to make their judgments...don't stampede and try to effect the process.
by Pink Lady on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 02:24:21 PM PDT
You do realize it was Hillary's supporters who managed to eff up the primary in Michigan so badly, yes? To the benefit of one candidate alone?
We most certainly do have people who would suppress voters. They've gotten away with it already.
As for the PPPP -- way back in November 2004, three scant weeks after the so-called election, Howard flew around the country to meet with Deaniac-DFA'rs and asked which of these was the best step:
-- run again for POTUS in 2008 -- launch a 3rd party to run in 2008 -- remake the party and return it to its roots
The first would have found us running headlong into the same problems we'd already seen in 2004.
The second would not gain the critical mass necessary to effect real change, might only be a Nader-like spoiler.
The third was the best option because we were already inside the party in many cases, and it would take less time to build the critical mass needed if we took this step than if we tried the previous two.
We've given it a shot, and in many cases, we've been extremely successful on a local basis. But we are still not done; it will take a generational shift before the house cleaning is done, and it will be messy if the generation that must yield is the same one to which the Clintons and the Dean brothers belong.
I think we openly launch the PPPP right inside the rank-and-file of the Dem Party; we've been a shadow inside party, a sleeper cell outside the party in DFA. It's time we hollow it out completely.
As Eli Pariser of MoveOn said after November 2004, "We bought it, we own it, it's ours."
The DLC and the machine can either lead, follow, or get the f*ck out of the way.
by Rayne on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 08:26:25 PM PDT
From the bottom up.
George W. Bush - the Percy Wetmore of presidents.
by rmx2630 on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 09:16:51 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 920 comments