View Story | 17 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
a few differences between Dean and BO. Dean was always ahead of the curve, and blunt about it. BO is all flowery bullshit.
I view BO as more beneficiary of what Dean initiated, rather than being an initiator of these forces.
Bush's presidency is now inextricably yoked to the policies of aggression and subjugation. Mike Whitney
by dfarrah on Sun Feb 17, 2008 at 03:12:47 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
Obama has been about community organizing from the start, and by the looks of it, he is a lot better at it than Dean...At least at the nuts and bolts stuff, like how to train people for the Caucus. We should have won Iowa, but we got all swept up into the national movement. Obama concentrated on Iowa and delivered the goods.
by PLS on Sun Feb 17, 2008 at 03:42:48 PM PDT
as a doctor most of his life and the position he had before he took over as Governor of Vermont was a part-time position [or maybe he was a legislator part-time before he became Lt Gov]. Dean's entry into full-time, higher level politics was almost an accident [the prior governor died suddenly, then Dean became governor].
So, he may very well have known less about political organizing than BO.
However, it was Dean who 1st started firing up the dems/grassroots about opposing GWB's policies, Dean who 1st began criticizing congress-critters for rolling over for GWB, Dean using the internet for grass roots organizing [he likes to say that the grass roots found him], telling people "you have the power," getting younger voters excited, etc.
Like Reagan before him, BO is riding into the WH on a wave of dissatisfaction, a wave started years ago by more liberal activists.
It takes time for ideas to trickle into the mainstream and to influence behavior. The dems as a party, as well as BO as a candidate, have greatly benefitted from HD's initiative and efforts.
by dfarrah on Sun Feb 17, 2008 at 04:27:36 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 17 comments