This is just the "$500 haircut" applied to HRC.

Oh, the Clintons are "well-off" sent Chelsea to
Stanford & Oxford. LIKE THAT'S A BAD THING?

It's not being affluent and sending your kids to upper-crust schools that's "A BAD THING."  It's your motivations in doing so that merit a subjective assessment of "good" or "bad."

Going to school with the goal of quickly making loot upon graduation is probably something many Kossacks look upon with skepticism and deservedly so since rapid acquisition of material wealth rarely coincides with the pursuit of social justice.

That's why many of us are impressed that Barack Obama chose NOT to become an investment banker or corporate lawyer; those are professions currently associated with impoverishing the lives of disadvantaged American workers, rather than enriching them.

You know we have reached the DKos end days when parents sending their children to top-notch colleges is considered 'elitist'.

It IS elitist.  There should be a word that objectively describes such schools and the mentality that venerates them.  It is "elitist."  Many paying students go there to do what Chelsea did - get on the fast track to a lucrative Wall Street job... OR to do what Barack did - gain the credentials that will qualify you for being US President some day.  Or Supreme Court Justice or U.S. District Attorney, etc., etc.  

The adjective can be spun negatively if one wants to or it can assume a positive connotation:

"My oldest son is a police officer who was just accepted into the SWAT team.  Less than 1/5 of the applicants can pass the training standards.  He's proud to belong to such an elite organization."

BTW, none of these DKos-Marx-people object to the ill-gotten Kennedy riches. Because, after all, Teddy endorsed Obama --- (that makes it okay).

I think the source of the Kennedy family's wealth is embarassing and ridiculous, but so what?  

GO OBAMA!!