View Story | 54 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
Look at her advisers..she has Sandy Berger and Madeleinn Albright there who were happy to drop bombs on humans...
These people are crazy...
Obama '08
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:44:01 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
I truely do not believe anyone who is a thinking person still believes in the PNAC agenda.
Time will Tell all the Truth VT, Virtual Truth
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:46:14 PM PDT
Blackwater USA is a part of the PNAC agenda..
Read Naomi Wolf's book, "The Shock Doctrine"..
Our economic meltdown is a part of the PNAC agenda.
The wall between the USA and Mexico is a part of the PNAC agenda..
Guantanamo is a part of the PNAC agenda..
Homeland Security and the Patriot Act are a part of the PNAC agenda..
We still have deaths of American soldiers in Iraq that was a part of the PNAC agenda..
Really..open your eyes..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:56:05 PM PDT
No, And I have been paying attention, long before Mother Jones. Welcome to the party.
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:58:38 PM PDT
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:04:20 PM PDT
Maybe I missed her signature on the PNAC Title page. I will go back and look for it.
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:09:27 PM PDT
This is as cold blooded as you can get.
http://www.youtube.com/...
The PNAC crowd wrote a letter to Clinton in 1998. They had plans to do to Iraq what has been done to Iraq at that time. Clinton knew what was coming. Hillary voted for the war resolution because she supported war against Iraq. She knew what she was voting for because the resolution states what Bush wanted to do. She can't apologize for her vote because she supported and supports Bush to this day.
She will give us more war. And Madeleinne Albright is a foreign policy adviser to Hillary right now...
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:23:09 PM PDT
How about the title page to the PNAC, did Albright sign this? Was Albright a signator of the letter to Clinton in 1998?
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:33:27 PM PDT
and you have to admit that she is as cold blooded a wretch as the get.
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:36:07 PM PDT
Hillary is not Bush, she will call the shots, not a Carl Rove. Hillary will listen to a balanced argument both pro and con about actions to take both domestic and international.
Sorry I realize I am a creature of debate boards.
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:41:27 PM PDT
This will show you what I am talking about...she is a signatory to PNAC..so stuff it...you Hillary supporter you..and his name is Karl..
http://www.newamericancentury.org/...
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:11:36 PM PDT
Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitage William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky
Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W. Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick
Nope I don't see her name. I do see a lot of Bush's cabinet as signers however.
by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:36:44 PM PDT
with the PNAC crowd when she was the recipient of their advise..??
Really, you look kind of silly supporting fascists and calling yourself a Democrat..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:26:55 PM PDT
cuz if you think PNAC and Albright are the same thing, we live on different planets.
But I get why you think Hillary is a warmonger now! ;)
All extremists are irrational and should be exposed
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:47:01 PM PDT
to death during the 1990's when we imposed sanctions on that defensless country..Hussein was no threat..she says he was contained..well they contained him by keeping his country an open prison..people have been so beaten there.
PNAC came about because Bush 41 would not invade Iraq knowing it would be a quagmire..Cheney said so at the time..
PNAC is about empire..everything that comes out of Albrights mouth is about American empire..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:59:43 PM PDT
in a way. If you want to use Pax Americanus as code language for empire, then I'd say that the Albrights are more about benevolent empire, the PNACs are about domination and forcing people to be like us, i.e. evil empire. Are either sustainable? I don't think so; we need something truly different. But if you can't tell the HUGE distinctions between those two, then I take your judgement less seriously.
And btw, who do you support this cycle? Do you really think Obama (whom I support) will be that much different foreign policy wise? I don't think anyone running is suggesting we transfer American empire power to an international governance scheme that has glocal input. That's what I'd do, but I'm not expecting any candidate to pull that off quite yet.
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 03:04:52 PM PDT
She is not about benevolent empire..she is about empire and the power and might of the USA...That is Neocon to me..that is what PNAC is all about..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:03:21 PM PDT
i can't discuss these things with you when you decide what labels and words mean "to you" willy nilly.
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:13:03 PM PDT
I see so many people like you here. It gets so tiresome.
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:25:02 PM PDT
but you tire me too, so we're even.
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:43:47 PM PDT
but then again .. so is Joe Biden..very curious.. and look at the date..my my..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:14:26 PM PDT
actually, it's a letter, not an indication of membership. but nice catch nonetheless.
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:28:03 PM PDT
which is curious..and the date is curious also..but what is really interesting is that a person with the last name of Bao Lord is a signatory to one other of these PNAC documents and she is in the FEC filings for Hillary's campaign fundraising..very curious..
by RubyGal on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:30:16 PM PDT
is what implication do these letters have? Why would anyone on the left want to be on any of these letters? I mean, the content of the letter was fine, I agree with it. But the letterhead you'd think would give one pause...
That being said, are you a fan of Zbigneiw Brzinzksky? (spelling is wrong) He's one of Obama's top foreign policy advisors and is a longstanding center left hawk. I happen to love him, but given some of his stances, wonder if you'd consider him a PNAC lover too??
by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:35:58 PM PDT
things..but he was also stating very clearly in the Carter administration that we had to move full speed ahead on alternative fuels because he correctly predicted the mess we are in now. Carter wanted to have this country work on energy with great vigor. Now we are behind the rest of the world when we could have been at the forefront of alternatives.
Reagan came in and the PNAC people saw this as the opportunity to push their agenda way back then..The Council for National Policy was formed by Rich DeVos..Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson ushered in the Evangelical political power needed to give the right wing election wins..and George Herbert Walker Bush started on his ambitious project to create black ops money by trafficking in drugs and weapons..that was what BCCI was about.
I don't know how Barack will be..but I surely do not want Hillary. It is the cold bloodedness of these people that is shocking..
by RubyGal on Thu Feb 07, 2008 at 06:34:08 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 54 comments