Daily Kos

View Story | 54 comments

  •  she's not a warmonger (8+ / 0-)

    she's a war-enabler. She only voted for the war resolution so that she wouldn't look silly after it was all over in 6 weeks after a stunning U.S. victory.

    For all her political savy, on of the things I hold against her the most is not having the savy to see that Iraq was going to be a boiling swamp of disaster. She should have seen it coming better, cuz I did.

    All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

    by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:28:32 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  She voted for an illegal war... (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      RickD, andydoubtless

      It was unlawful for Bush to engage in a preemptive attack on a soveriegn nation that had no defense...plain and simple..and she supported it no matter what she may have thought the duration of the war would be..it was an unlawful military engagement..there are international laws that prohibit wanton aggression by the militarily advanced countries upon the defenseless little nations..problem for Iraq was the fact that they had oil...

      She knew what she was doing and has never apologized for it because she supported it...

    •  Everyone did..we orgainzed 50,000 (0+ / 0-)

      marchers in Seattle and our protests have been ignored..the women from New Jersey who asked for 9/11 investigations have never been given answers to some of the most basic questions..that silence is like Hillary's silence..

      •  well, to me a warmonger (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        JayBat, andydoubtless

        initiates wars. Someone who is more passive in their support doesn't get the "monger" label.

        This means, I don't think she'd continue the bush doctrine foreign policy if she won. But it also means I won't vote for her in the primaries.

        All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

        by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:35:35 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  She wanted to bomb the spit out of Belgrade (0+ / 0-)

          during Clinton I.

          I know who Obama's veep will be. You can too!

          by slaney black on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:38:23 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  so did i (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            JayBat

            NATO, i.e. 19 countries all agreed that they needed to solve this problem militarily, as negotiations with Milosovic were impossible. And there was no conquest about this, it was to stop a genocide. So I can't accept this as warmongering.

            All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

            by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:45:42 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

        •  I think she would continue the PNAC objectives (0+ / 0-)

          Look at her advisers..she has Sandy Berger and Madeleinn Albright there who were happy to drop bombs on humans...

          These people are crazy...

          •  Huh? (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            SeanF

            I truely do not believe anyone who is a thinking person still believes in the PNAC agenda.

            Time will Tell all the Truth VT, Virtual Truth

            by VirtualTruth on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:46:14 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

          •  then i guess we are very different (0+ / 0-)

            cuz if you think PNAC and Albright are the same thing, we live on different planets.

            But I get why you think Hillary is a warmonger now!
            ;)

            All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

            by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 02:47:01 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Albright knew that Iraqi children were starving (0+ / 0-)

              to death during the 1990's when we imposed sanctions on that defensless country..Hussein was no threat..she says he was contained..well they contained him by keeping his country an open prison..people have been so beaten there.

              PNAC came about because Bush 41 would not invade Iraq knowing it would be a quagmire..Cheney said so at the time..

              PNAC is about empire..everything that comes out of Albrights mouth is about American empire..

              •  i think you are nuts (0+ / 0-)

                in a way. If you want to use Pax Americanus as code language for empire, then I'd say that the Albrights are more about benevolent empire, the PNACs are about domination and forcing people to be like us, i.e. evil empire. Are either sustainable? I don't think so; we need something truly different. But if you can't tell the HUGE distinctions between those two, then I take your judgement less seriously.

                And btw, who do you support this cycle? Do you really think Obama (whom I support) will be that much different foreign policy wise? I don't think anyone running is suggesting we transfer American empire power to an international governance scheme that has glocal input. That's what I'd do, but I'm not expecting any candidate to pull that off quite yet.

                All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

                by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 03:04:52 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  She was not about benevolent empire.. (0+ / 0-)

                  She is not about benevolent empire..she is about empire and the power and might of the USA...That is Neocon to me..that is what PNAC is all about..

                  •  you need to get you vocabulary sorted (0+ / 0-)

                    i can't discuss these things with you when you decide what labels and words mean "to you" willy nilly.

                    All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

                    by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:13:03 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  Obviously you are a hostile idiot (0+ / 0-)

                      I see so many people like you here.  It gets so tiresome.  

                      •  i was trying to be nice actually (0+ / 0-)

                        but you tire me too, so we're even.

                        All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

                        by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 04:43:47 PM PDT

                        [ Parent ]

                        •  Madeleine Albright is a signatory to PNAC (0+ / 0-)

                          but then again .. so is Joe Biden..very curious.. and look at the date..my my..

                          http://www.newamericancentury.org/...

                          •  nice catch (0+ / 0-)

                            actually, it's a letter, not an indication of membership. but nice catch nonetheless.

                            All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

                            by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:28:03 PM PDT

                            [ Parent ]

                            •  Joe Biden is on this also... (0+ / 0-)

                              which is curious..and the date is curious also..but what is really interesting is that a person with the last name of Bao Lord is a signatory to one other of these PNAC documents and she is in the FEC filings for Hillary's campaign fundraising..very curious..

                              •  well what's hard to tell (0+ / 0-)

                                is what implication do these letters have? Why would anyone on the left want to be on any of these letters? I mean, the content of the letter was fine, I agree with it. But the letterhead you'd think would give one pause...

                                That being said, are you a fan of Zbigneiw Brzinzksky? (spelling is wrong) He's one of Obama's top foreign policy advisors and is a longstanding center left hawk. I happen to love him, but given some of his stances, wonder if you'd consider him a PNAC lover too??

                                All extremists are irrational and should be exposed

                                by SeanF on Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 05:35:58 PM PDT

                                [ Parent ]

                                •  Well...I think he has written some unfortunate (0+ / 0-)

                                  things..but he was also stating very clearly in the Carter administration that we had to move full speed ahead on alternative fuels because he correctly predicted the mess we are in now.  Carter wanted to have this country work on energy with great vigor.  Now we are behind the rest of the world when we could have been at the forefront of alternatives.

                                  Reagan came in and the PNAC people saw this as the opportunity to push their agenda way back then..The Council for National Policy was formed by Rich DeVos..Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson ushered in the Evangelical political power needed to give the right wing election wins..and George Herbert Walker Bush started on his ambitious project to create black ops money by trafficking in drugs and weapons..that was what BCCI was about.

                                  I don't know how Barack will be..but I surely do not want Hillary.  It is the cold bloodedness of these people that is shocking..

View Story | 54 comments