...in Kansas, Nebraska, Idaho?

That's the problem.  She will ignore these states, killing any chance to grow our party.

Gotta give credit to Obama... he's using the 50 state strategy and its working!

Thanks,

Mike

No one is suggesting that anyone "throw away" years of personal relationships.  Those are essential and people at DKos who don't respect that system have a lot to learn about how politics (and life) work.

But you know that personal relationships have a limit.  Let's say you're a Democratic Congressman or Governor who ran for office to make genuine change for your state.  You've worked hard, you've learned the system, and you've even worked hard with people on the other side of the aisle to get things done.

Now here comes Hillary leading the Democratic ticket.  She is one of the most polarizing political figures in the country right now and has been for many years.  Unfairly, I might add, but nonetheless - it is what it is.

Why should all your hard work, alliances, and political career have to end because of a down-ballot backlash against Hillary?  

Maybe it won't happen.  Maybe your constituents know better and are able to make the distinction - I suspect that most voters are capable of that.  But do you want to take that chance and see your political career end or do you want to see the person who is not divisive and is reaching new voters that can offset the wingnuts in your district?

Again, never underestimate a politician's instinct for self-preservation.