View Story | 141 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
It would be changing the rules to then decide that those delegates should determine the nominee.
"[R]ather high-minded, if not a bit self-referential"--The Washington Post.
by Geekesque on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:51:35 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
...has always been the purview of the convention.
Teacher's Lounge: Out of Habit is open
by rserven on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:54:09 PM PDT
But that wouldn't be fair.
But it would be good for your candidate.
by Geekesque on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:55:10 PM PDT
Stuff it.
by rserven on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:55:46 PM PDT
Also, you always turn up in these threads to defend the pro-Clinton side of the argument.
Without a single exception in the past year.
by Geekesque on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:59:08 PM PDT
I defended Richardson. I've defended Kucinich. I will defend any of our candidates.
The reason you see the defense of Clinton more is because she is attacked more, quite often by you.
My candidate is whoever the party selects as its nominee.
by rserven on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 10:01:48 PM PDT
Too bad it's not born out by your posting history.
http://www.dailykos.com/...
Your posting history is uniformly pro-Clinton and either neutral or critical towards Obama.
Sorry, but I do not buy your impartial pose.
by Geekesque on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 10:07:58 PM PDT
Nowhere in that post did I say I was going to vote for Clinton. It was specifically about GLBT issues and who I thought was better. I am not a single issue voter.
by rserven on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 10:13:10 PM PDT
on this site, despite your claim to the contrary.
Not. a. single. damn. time.
You always, without exception, 100% of the time, side with the Clinton side as opposed to the Obama side of any disagreement.
You may have yourself fooled, but not me. Your stance can be predicted with 100% accuracy by asking "what would be best for Clinton?"
by Geekesque on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 10:19:21 PM PDT
Your search is not definitive. For anything to show up there, I would have to refer to Obama by name. Normally, it is not necessary.
I habitually call for hit diaries against Obama to be deleted. I've argued with Alegre until I was blue in the face about being positive for her candidate and not negative against the others.
But I guess that doesn't matter. Believe what you want. But it doesn't make it true.
by rserven on Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 07:27:28 AM PDT
by this user get TRed.
I've had it.
- What happens on DailyKos, stays on Google.
by Jon Meltzer on Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 02:10:25 AM PDT
by Geekesque on Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 07:32:54 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 141 comments