View Story | 123 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
...if he had run a better campaign he could have won by a margin that couldn't have been overturned. There are many reasons why Gore "lost."
by cavebird on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 08:28:12 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
no need to isolate one -- let it all go.
What FDR giveth; GWB taketh away.
by Marie on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 08:34:35 PM PDT
It's kind of obvious that every close loss could've been averted with a "better" campaign. But Gore's choice of Lieberman wasn't so obviously bad back then, and Nader, Rehnquist, Thomas, Kennedy, Sandra whatshername, and Scalia helped fuck up the country and the world.
by amitxjoshi on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 08:54:42 PM PDT
Don't know why Dems in leadership today are so cockeyed that they believe the exact opposite message from the truth: Clinton was impeached, and Bush got elected promising to "restore integrity."
Why in God's name they aren't standing up to this NAZI and pointing out what kind of "integrity" he has brought us, I don't know.
It's plain as day that voters believed Bush's con job in 2000, and they believed it because they wanted to believe it, BECAUSE Clinton was impeached.
so, why doesn't THAT apply to this fascist we have in the White House who comes up with new ways to shit on the constitution and commit crimes nearly every day? Ask Pelosi. I don't know who is drugging her daily, but what a cocktail!
Quo Warranto?
by taraka das on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 10:40:20 PM PDT
to win the popular vote despite:
Please see.
Evan Bayh is a McCain/Lieberman clone.
by NeuvoLiberal on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 09:18:50 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 123 comments