Daily Kos

View Story | 36 comments

  •  so it's really a shame (0+ / 0-)

    That they have blown the joint-ticket option (person with most delegates on top).  I really do believe they could pull in the most votes together, since there is little overlap in their bases.

    by sunshineonthebay on Tue Mar 11, 2008 at 02:11:43 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  "they"? (0+ / 0-)

      I think Clinton's "not qualified" statements blew the joint-ticket option.  I think it was an awful, awful mistake on her part and I think the voters and superdelegates should refuse to reward her for it.

      "What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is." --Dan Quayle

      by jakester on Tue Mar 11, 2008 at 02:14:00 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  "reward her"? (0+ / 0-)

        It's not about rewarding or punishing, it's about winning in Nov.  That's the only thing I care about.

        by sunshineonthebay on Tue Mar 11, 2008 at 02:16:59 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  both can win (0+ / 0-)

          and by just about every metric I've seen, Obama's chances are better.

          Clinton's people don't want us to know that, however, so they make up silly arguments about "big states" as if primary victories have anything to do with general election victories.

          If you think Clinton has the best shot at winning in November, I'd love to hear your argument.  But please, no more of this "big state" primary-win gobbledygook.  It's senseless and doesn't stand up to basic analysis.

          "What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is." --Dan Quayle

          by jakester on Tue Mar 11, 2008 at 02:24:43 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

View Story | 36 comments