View Story | 68 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
You are undoubtedly correct that is what HRC's intentions are. But I think that you are jumping the gun in terms of a couple of things...
First, He seems to be surviving this quite well. The latest respectable press has been, almost unanimously, positive. This poll shows that he may be weathering this without too great of a hit.
Second, Obama's campaign crew are brilliant and, I believe, up to the task.
Third, superdelegates...no one knows where many of them are at. At the same time, these are professional politicians and I'm sure that many of them realize what Obama brings to the Dems.
Obama is playing it his way. If he's got the right stuff, it's going to work. I believe he does have the right stuff.
"We're all working for the Pharaoh" - Richard Thompson
by mayan on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 08:56:26 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
That's Hillary target. And Hillary might get 10-15% at PA Which means Hillary very much can pull the scheme with some strong arm pulling.
by Gwen12 on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:01:55 PM PDT
article. If I read it, the editorial and other NY Times articles correctly, it looks like things might be souring even as we speak for HRC and staff. I've said this before, but this article reads more like something from Kos himself.
NY Times: HRC's Options Are Narrowing Quickly
by mayan on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:29:18 PM PDT
We are sitting here talking as if the game is "fair", but it is not. It is rigged against Obama.
So the burden is on him to be more alert.
Clinton has the machine, that's why she got so many breaks despite consistently losing.
Superdelegates are as corrupt as any other politicians. I don't buy a bit that they are this "activists" for the best of bla bla bla....
THEY WILL go to the highest bidder if they see things are going good for them.
by Gwen12 on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 10:25:22 PM PDT
what I've been writing. Whatever.
by mayan on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 10:30:49 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 68 comments