Daily Kos

View Story | 9 comments

  •  Bad Analogy (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MajorFlaw

    There is a defined winning score in this game, and neither Candidate can get there without Superdelegates.

    We have no intention of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh because lying through your teeth and being stupid isn't a crime.

    by The Baculum King on Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 10:46:06 PM PDT

    •  Perhaps true, but how does that (0+ / 0-)

      change the fact that Hillary wants to change the rules mid-game in order to have a better argument to make to the superdelegates?

      Si se fucking puede! - Melody Townsel

      by Endangered Alaskan Dem on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 02:08:00 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The Analogy is Apt... (0+ / 0-)

      We're in the Final Four basketball tournament, and everyone knows that the willingness of the refs to call foul more against one team than the other can directly affect the game.

      Obama is winning in points (the way the game is scored) and should go to the Championship game against McCain.

      Hillary is whining that no team in past Championship games has ever won without a good passing game. The complaint is simple moot, and ignores the fact that a good team will play differently against different opponents.

      by TheOpinionGuy on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 06:06:19 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

View Story | 9 comments