View Story | 24 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
John Humphreys and and his minions on the Today program. The brilliant Any Questions on R4 and Question Time on TV. And PM (and even Women's Hour) have been known to go all bulldog-like on politicians who are trying to defend the indefensible.
Andrew Marr's book "My Trade" is fascinating on this subject - apparently the Today program was not very important until Thatcher let it be known that she listened to it every morning - and suddenly it became a rite of passage for politicians to go on and get bludgeoned. I heard Humphreys ripping Jack Straw a new one the other day about refusing to hold an inquiry into the War in Iraq and it made me all warm inside.
I have a theory that it all stems from PMQs. Do you think if the President had to answer a half hour of direct questions, live and televised, every Wednesday lunchtime, the US would have a more active media landscape? Ok, half the questions at PMQs are meatballs - but all the ones from the Tories and LibDems are great. And occasionally you get a Labour backbencher with a spine too.
-5.62, -7.54
by tyelperion on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 01:39:46 AM PDT
in particular the President, Lord help us, take on the role of the Monarchy and Monarch in the UK as a figurehead of the state, and a repository of national pride and identity. IMO, this creates a far too reverent view of the apparatus and potential of state, if not of the particular people who inhabit that apparatus. Ironically, separating the two seems to make a more sophisticated view of the process easier as national pride and the (notional) role of politicians are more easily compartmentalized in the mind, assisting greater objectivity. Expectations of the government are lowered to something, IMO, more realistic. Politicians are temporarily employed managers, a matter of necessity, convenience and practicality, not the embodiment of some kind of fantastical ideal or the totemic mascot of a team. They don't even have to pretend to be.
by Conservative Socialist on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 01:48:41 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
wide narrow
View Story | 24 comments