View Story | 47 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
That would only justify the attack line via the Wright videos. You'd lose any credibility to dismiss those attacks, once you're doing the same. Moreover, it's just not the right thing to do. Keep the video and move on.
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -- Philip K. Dick
by RandomGuyFromGermany on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 06:29:09 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
I wrote fourteen months ago about marginalizing the smear merchants in the media. I do not want to promote such attacks here.
by Nuisance Industry on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 06:46:00 AM PDT
Only if they are both the same is there not a difference. The Family is a dangerous dominionist organization, and we should all have no reservations about attacking such a group.
-- "Cheap Labor Conservative"-use the term everywhere
by pdrap on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 07:33:55 AM PDT
If you'd like to attack the group as such, fine. If you'd attack Hillary because of some indirect and construed "ties" to that group, I'd say just don't do it.
If you like Obama being seen solely responsible for his own words, and not those of his pastor, then judge Hillary by her own words, and not by some whacko remarks of someone she just knows. She makes plenty mistakes herself.
by RandomGuyFromGermany on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 07:47:39 AM PDT
by pdrap on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 09:26:11 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 47 comments