View Story | 35 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
I'm against her on pure electability. I think she's running to the right to govern from the left, but that's part of the reason why she's unelectable. This is an election we should run to the left.
An agnostic not because I don't know if there's a God, but because I don't care.
by filmgeek83 on Mon Mar 03, 2008 at 07:57:00 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
whacked during Clinton the First. Part of it was due to the bombthrowers class of 94 but for the most part he balanced the budget on the backs of the disenfranchised. I was working poverty law in the mean streets and I remember each program getting squashed. Of course, it's my prediction and uninformed speculation about what HRC would do but realistically she has not been pounding the bully pulpit for any number of progressive issues. She's not a liberal. All you have to do is look at Mark Penn. There's a synergy between client and practioner.
"We're all working for the Pharaoh" - Richard Thompson
by mayan on Mon Mar 03, 2008 at 08:00:54 PM PDT
....conceded far too much rhetorical ground to Gingrich et al., even AFTER he'd whipped their asses in the budget showdown. He should have pressed the advantage and tried a bit harder for a Democratic comeback in Congress in 1996.
by metal prophet on Mon Mar 03, 2008 at 08:39:02 PM PDT
Realistically, his eight years seem like the Classical period of Greek history compared to the Caligula in Chief...but, in a way, so did Nixon's years in office. Well, not quite...but you know what I'm saying!
by mayan on Mon Mar 03, 2008 at 08:47:13 PM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 35 comments