It's Hillary insisting it be kept in place, but obviously the point of a "revote" is that the first round didn't count.  So, clearly, 2E should not apply.  Obama is absolutely right to stop Hillary's "my way or nothing" sham election.

40% of those who voted in the Democratic primary voted uncommitted.  That doesn't measure how many people voted in the Republican primary instead (or tried to write in Obama, Edwards, Richardson, etc., and therefore had their ballot invalidated.)  It is rather amazing that uncommitted did so well -- clearly, if Edwards, Obama, and others had been on the ballot, their cumulative total would have been a good 15-20% higher (the percentage of people estimated to have crossed over instead.)

Either way, it doesn't matter -- the Michigan constitution won't allow Hillary's way.  The courts have ruled on this.  What Hillary wanted to do was clearly illegal.  Illegal.  There was no way the Michigan courts would allow the Democratic party to receive the lists of how everyone voted (which would be necessary for the DNC to know who to exclude).  And it had nothing to do with Obama supporters or Obama's lawyers -- there weren't even party to the lawsuit.  It was an ACLU issue.  

So, by definition, Hillary does not want a fair, nor secret ballot.  She wants the lists of how everyone voted the last time, so they can systematically exclude those of us who voted in the Republican primary instead (since we weren't allowed to vote for our own candidate.)  

Obama supported (and still does) a revote without restrictions, or a caucus, or a 50/50 split, or any of a number of other, fairer options.  Hillary won't allow it.  She tied her hopes to the only option which stacked the deck in her favor, and the courts rightfully said "uh, no."  Now rather than work to find a fair way of doing the elections, she's publicly lying about Obama's stance.  

What, exactly, more do you need before you realize that Hillary Clinton is simply unfit to be President of the United States?