... of that either.  But I had no indication that her campaign would do half the things it has done either... from mismanagement to going negative...

Nothing, but nothing would surprise me.  

...she is not likely to get much traction. But probably enough to do a "Nader" on the Obama campaign. However: such a move will make her 1000% more hated than she already is.

Is Hillary Clinton willing to go down in history as the second Ralph Nader, the one who threw the election to McCain and gave us at least four more years of Bush-shit? Is she so egomaniacal that she would choose infamy over a graceful exit in 2008 and the possibility of other campaigns in the future? Very, very good question.

She has unfortunately won the media narrative this past week. Even though Obama losing in single digits in both states would keep him with a substantial delegate lead (not including Brokaw's 50 supers) she has made it such that he needs to win Texas to be able to drop endorsements on her tomorrow and end it.

On the other hand, the polling and press coverage for the last day or so has significantly raised expectations of her in Ohio so there is some opportunity there.

In short, I'm nervous and must keep rambling.

Anyone up for a game of basketball? :)

My gut tells me Texas is possible. I am losing hope for OH for some reason.

Anyone else think he does have a very good chance at Texas but losing some hope for OH? I say this because Hillary is speaking at 7:30. Something tells me she is speaking before RI even closes their polls. And she will not win VT. So that makes thinks HRC Internal polling numbers for OH are so good, she is sure she will win there but not sure about TX.

Why else speak so early? Her internals must be damn good for Ohio.