View Story | 27 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
is not a royalist party. They have consistently opposed the monarchy by pushing for democracy, and suffered a great deal of political persecution for it. It had socialist origins and is still a member of the Socialist International, although it has recently moved in a neoliberal, free market direction.
They have sometimes cooperated with the monarchy in forming governments, but only in conjunction with a broad coalition of other parties.
by Jonathanonymous on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 04:26:01 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
All I remember is that the BBC was playing up the angle that everyone in Nepal loves the royal family, and that it was a done deal.
"Fighting a war to fix something works about as good as going to a whorehouse to get rid of a clap." -- Norman Mailer
by tbetz on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 04:56:16 PM PDT
that the royal family has had a dramatic fall from almost godlike status 20 years ago to nearly universal scorn today. The royal family massacre a few years ago, in which the only surviving royal prince was never completely freed from suspicion, played a big role, as did his sudden decision to end democracy and crush dissent by force. But that is based on reports that were written by westerners, and Nepalese students in the US, so the view in the countryside might be different.
I wonder if you are thinking of Bhutan, which recently had it's first election right next door? There the royalist party did win overwhelmingly. http://news.bbc.co.uk/...
The Nepalese were also an issue in that election, because the ethnic minority living in Bhutan was forced into refugee camps outside of the country ahead of the elections, to ensure a "pure" citizenry.
by Jonathanonymous on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 05:06:23 PM PDT
In fact, I StephenHadleyed™ Bhutan and Nepal.
Thanks.
by tbetz on Mon Apr 14, 2008 at 07:48:43 AM PDT
View Story | 27 comments