Daily Kos

View Story | 30 comments

  •  Plus, Bob Barr may run for the Libertarian Party (4+ / 0-)

    While Keyes might draw away some of the religious right, Bob Barr might attract some libertarian-leaning Republicans if he decides to run.   Perhaps combined they can counteract whatever Nader effect their might be.

    •  Bob Barr may be helpful in Montana and Alaska. (4+ / 0-)

      Which are already surprisingly close (for Obama); it could swing things; we'll already be spending money to get out Democratic votes to help elect Begich and Berkowitz in Alaska, and re-elect Schweitzer, Baucus and elect Jim Hunt in Montana.

      I see no reason not to do a semi-coordinated campaign in those states.

      MT and AK tend to be the best targets for third-party candidates [and Nader wasn't all Democrats, although it was disproportionately that; there were definitely some independents and maybe one or two Repubs for him], Nader and Perot did quite well there proportionately in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004.

      R0n P4v1 got 2.74% of the vote in AK in 1988, 1.38% in MT, while getting only 0.47% nationwide.

      David Bergland (libertarian) got 1.35% in MT, 3.07% in AK while getting 0.25% nationwide.

      1. Ed Clark (libertarian) got 11.66% of the vote in Alaska, John Anderson got 7.04% (still slightly more than nationwide)

      while Montana gave 8.05% to John Anderson to 2.70% to Clark.

View Story | 30 comments