Daily Kos

View Story | 246 comments

  •  Mike Easley is a DINO (19+ / 0-)

    He has been a big disappointment. Social services, especially mental health services, have suffered greatly under his administration. He has allowed corrupt privatization of social services.

    His privatization has led to massive fraud and abuse.

    Easely's endorsement is one delegate for Hillary.

    "It's the planet, stupid."

    by FishOutofWater on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 05:48:59 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Easley (8+ / 0-)

      ought to hear from some of his constituents tonight, methinks.

      It's no coincidence that both the current candidates for governor, Perdue and Moore, are supporting Obama.

    •  Wow, how said has our political process become... (0+ / 0-)

      that it is reduced to political gamesmanship, namecalling and petty bullshit (Wright).

      4000+ dead in Iraq. They won't vote this November.

      "I would like to see less people go to church on Sunday and more people volunteering among the poor and hopeless"

      by comeinpbrstreetgang on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 07:44:43 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Easley is also (0+ / 0-)

      invisible.  Tonight's announcement of his endorsement was the first time I've spotted him on TV in ages.  Hardly recognized the guy.

      Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. --Mark Twain

      by goheelsgodems on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:52 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Mike Easley's endorsement (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      sja

      couldn't get Ed Turlington, Edwards' 2004 campaign chairman, elected state party chair.

      Any other year, his endorsement might still mean something in the primary. But turnout is going to be huge, people have already pretty much made up their minds, and given Obama's congressional district strategy, his endorsements from congressmen Price, Watt, and Butterfield - as well as a significant number of mayors - will carry a lot more weight than anything Easley could muster.

      Oh, o/t, but on the subject of mayors - Markos keeps talking about endorsements by mayors being key because of the machines they command through patronage. I don't know about other states, but in North Carolina that's got to be the most ignorant statement he's ever made.

      Almost all city gov'ts here are council/manager systems in which hiring decisions are made by city managers and their staffs, so patronage doesn't come into play. Local elections are almost always off-year, almost entirely nonpartisan, and are so far under the average voter's radar that the turnout largely consists of political junkies, ideologues, and a decent number of conscientious citizens - none of whom are likely to be swayed by a Tammany-style machine. Mayors and city councils tend to get elected by forming coalitions of people with money and the core voters of one or other of the two major parties.

      Forming such coalitions takes some political skill, so a mayor's endorsement carries a fair amount of moral weight. But if you want patronage-fueled machines, you'd be better off asking who got the endorsement of the local sheriff (who appoints his deputies) or the local register of deeds (who appoints the deputy registers).

View Story | 246 comments