Clinton supporter invited Wright

Wright was invited to the National Press Club by a journalist and minister who supports Clinton.

The Tribune reports that Wright was invited by Barbara Reynolds, a former USA Today editorial board member who has written on personal blog of her support for Clinton.

And this is probably just 1 of 50 things that Hillary's campaign has been doing behind the scenes to fan the flames of Wright for many weeks now.

Chortling how he and his Dittos circumvented Obama by keeping Hillary viable with Operation Kaos. Kommander Krunch proudly announced his army of Dittos infiltrated and voted for Hillary in state after state, keeping her viable when without him, she would already be toast.

Now while I think Rush is more fueled by Oxy and Lorcet than reality, Kommander Krunch said that his Dittos in some cases wore street clothes and other times wore official uniforms (beanie was optional) but they also infiltrated by "stinking" and "not bathing" and making sure they were as offensive physically as possible.

Now since these Dittos were all supposedly registering as Democrats for the first time, what is the demographic of newly registered Democratic voters and why do I think I hear a dogwhistle?

This is more of a problem for American society than Rev Wright will ever present.    

Who put you in charge of the "good" and "bad" lists?

What are the Republican 527's going to do with this?

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/...

Does not doom Obama's candidacy, but if it did so what.  What you liberals have always failed to understand about people of faith is that we really do hold ourselves to a standard higher than just the material idiots of this world.  When we see injustice we must speak and act.  If it were not for our attitude black people would still be at the back of the bus.  In a sense though I'm glad.  I hope now the Rev. Wright feels fully unconstrained to speak, and if Barack is going to be just another corporate shill I look forward to him going after him in January.

I really dislike the way you are trying to break this down into two simply catagories of bad and good.  It is far to black and white for my taste and doesn't reflect reality.

somehow manipulated Wright to go on Moyers, got him invited to the Detroit NAACP and the Nat. Press Club.  
Also, I think I read someone that Hillary introduced Obama to Wright in the late 80's so she could put this story in her sink and throw it at him sometime in the future.  This would be one of those left wing conspiracies.

The good Kossacks here realized exactly what was going on; the bad Kossacks (the Wright lovers) here were quite willing to have the entire Obama campaign go down the toilet as a referendum on "angry black man syndrome",

but they lost.

Bad Kossacks, we have your number now.

I gotta say, I really have a problem with tarring our fellow Kossaks as 'good' and 'bad' based on their various positions on the Wright issue.  I don't think any Obama supporters wanted the campaign to 'go down the toilet'.  Rev. Wright's comments have prompted a pretty wide range of response among people here.  The most disturbing thing I noticed among Kossaks prior to Obama's press conference was a frenzied, panicky sense of "All is LOST!!".  As for Wright's behavior at the presser, it was almost universally denounced by Obama supporters.

And I'd love to know what you meant by "we have your number now."  It sounds almost menacing.

Hillary or that obnoxious Hannity has to  do anything to destroy Obama. His spiritual pastor is doing a good job. republicans will be using him for a long time.

messing up and harming the Obama campaign at the NAACP gathering in Detroit, but, in any event, we dodged the bullet.

Whew.

And, Wright is finished. He is now garbage.

I hope the Wright-Reynolds-Hillary connection gets some airplay.

You high user ID# are showing a lot about yourselves right now. A person can support Obama without trashing Black people and the Black community.

... just stand up there and say, "While some of the things Rev. Wright said were off the mark, and I don't agree with them, there were others, particularly regarding how our foreign policy decisions can affect what comes back on our nation, that are absolutely correct."

Do we want to address current American foreign policy or some meta-narrative - the"logic of power" as you call it? I personally would like to put out the fire in our house before we start rebuilding it.

Furthermore, I just think equating the United States with Al Qaeda is absurd. Does the American government have as its express purpose the destruction of the people of the Arab world? Does the American government wantonly and intentionally seek out civilian targets? Come on. It is possible to condemn Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, Rendition, Waterboarding, the Shock and Awe campaign without making inaccurate comparisons which don't just alienate MSM but most Americans as well. I am a decided progressive  and an Obama supporter and your parallel between 911 and our invasion in Iraq makes me bristle. Yes we should not have gone in... yes the Iraqi casualties in the hundreds of thousands are something for which those directing the military policy will have to atone, yes to all of it. But collateral damage is different from striking civilians to strike fear in people's hearts. Bush and his cronies were wrong wrong wrong but I don't think they sat in the White House rejoicing in Iraqi civilian death. Intent matters.

I would never suggest that America's foreign policy of this last eight years is anything other than a moral disaster. But I won't call it terrorism because to do so is stupid. End of story.

... by Karl Rove, Inc.

Although, the majority doesn't think "the damage is done."