That happens to be a topic I'm very well-versed on and passionate about.  It is not an exaggeration at all to call it filth.

As I posted down thread -- if 20/20 does a special on gay rights, you're saying by law they have to devote time to anti-gay zealots insisting homosexuality is a choice?  If NBC does an expose on mistakes made during the Iraq war, you're saying by law they have to devote time to people saying everything's peachy, regardless of the evidence?  If PBS does a program on glacier erosion due to global warming, you're saying by law they have to include global warming skeptics insisting there's nothing to worry about, or you'll fine them and take away their broadcasting license?

That's what you're advocating, and that's what would happen.  It would set us back ages.  It's the antithesis of a free press.