Daily Kos

View Story | 89 comments

  •  Thanks (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    p gorden lippy

    I appreciate the quick response. It seems to me in all fairness if the code you refer to has been provided, his results previously, independently replicated the world over, and many predictions confirmed, that that objection is no longer significant, yes?

    Read UTI, your free thought forum

    by DarkSyde on Sat May 10, 2008 at 04:59:57 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  It wasn't so much an objection (0+ / 0-)

      as an observation as to the reason for some of his criticism.  I said he brought some of that on himself by holding back the code that produces his results.  But yes that seems to have been resolved.

      As for "independently replicated", I don't see how that would have been possible prior to his publishing his code in September, as far as GISS surface temp analysis goes, at least.

      I suspect there will be minor quibbles about fudge factors for certain sites (that critics will blow out of proportion!).  But still, he could have deflected a lot of criticism by being open much earlier.

      I'll look into it further and post some links to what I find.

      "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - G. Marx

      by Skeptical Bastard on Sat May 10, 2008 at 06:18:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

View Story | 89 comments