View Story | 38 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
to read the book and explain to us its deficiencies.
Until then, I suggest you keep an open mind and quit the relentless pooh poohing on this thread, as if it is going to stop those of us who are intersted and concerned from talking about it and many others from reading and discussing the book.
FrederickClarkson.com and TalktoAction.org
by Frederick Clarkson on Mon May 12, 2008 at 08:23:45 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
doth protest too much. If The Family is so 'harmless' why not shed a bit more light on its functions, its members and its rites?
I mean, I'm sure this quote from Jeff's piece in Harper's ought to discount all fears about the Family:
During the 1960s the Family forged relationships between the U.S. government and some of the most anti-Communist (and dictatorial) elements within Africa's postcolonial leadership. The Brazilian dictator General Costa e Silva, with Family support, was overseeing regular fellowship groups for Latin American leaders, while, in Indonesia, General Suharto (whose tally of several hundred thousand "Communists" killed marks him as one of the century's most murderous dictators) was presiding over a group of fifty Indonesian legislators. During the Reagan Administration the Family helped build friendships between the U.S. government and men such as Salvadoran general Carlos Eugenios Vides Casanova, convicted by a Florida jury of the torture of thousands, and Honduran general Gustavo Alvarez Martinez, himself an evangelical minister, who was linked to both the CIA and death squads before his own demise. "We work with power where we can," the Family's leader, Doug Coe, says, "build new power where we can't."
Just another socializing fraternal club, right duha?
by DelicateMonster on Mon May 12, 2008 at 08:31:45 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 38 comments