It's true. He said West Virginia was too racist for Obama, just like you did - although you tried to deny you inserted racism into this in one comment and then say you were acknowledging the obvious in another. Indeed, I amended my prediction, saying there was no reason Bill Clinton couldn't be right about an 80 percent win for her. But you're still not acknowledging your error in your bigoted view.

Admit it, you're no kos or Poblano:

p.s. Here's Poblano on the notion that WV is a "racist state":

I do want to write a little bit more about the notion that West Virginians are racist. The longer version will have to wait until later today or tomorrow. But the short version is: yes, there are racist voters in West Virginia, but there are racist voters in every state. The primary determinant of the extent to which racism tends to be more manifest is education levels, and so the effects may be more noticeable in West Virgnia, a state with poor academic achievement. But there is no reason to believe that West Virgnians are particularly racist, relative to their education levels.

p.p.s. To all you Obama supporters tempted to belittle or insult West Virginia, just remember how annoying it has been when the Clinton camp has done that to Obama states like Idaho and Utah and Mississippi. A 50-state strategy means just that. You don't go around insulting states.

So I'm not the only one who thinks you were wrong. And