What are YOU asserting?  You're assuming that we don't win among working class white voters--which outside of the South is demonstrably wrong--and then blaming it on attitudes of disdain toward working class whites.  In other words, whether you realize it or not, you're using the GOP elitist argument, which was adopted directly from George Wallace.  

But none of what you're saying is really an argument.  You're just spewing banal (and inaccurate) talking points.

about the demo being  poor, racist, ignorant, inbred, or from Appalachia. That must be your own projecting.

EVERYONE in Vermont is a rich person from New York!  It's Bernie Sanders, Ben and Jerry and a bunch of other rich New Yorkers.  

Oh, and I think Bob Newhart and Larry, Darrel and Darrell.  But everyone else in Vermont, they're rich.

No.

But you're asserting that we lose working class white voters .

Outside the South, we in fact WIN among working class white voters.

You're asserting that it's diaries like this which is why something happens (even though you're wrong, because it doesn't happen).

What I do or don't think about the diary doesn't improve your poor reasoning and command of facts on this matter.

I'm not logically consistent in pointing out a single logical inconsistency unless I point out every logical inconsistency that everyone has?

Ludicrous.  I hope you're just trying to salvage what you perceive as a "win" in a dispute, and that you don't actually believe something that ridiculous.  

...whether you think I look like a jackass.

Whether jackasses think I look like a jackass doesn't concern me.